Dear Swistle,
I love your blog, and have been an avid reader for several years.
I am writing to you because my husband and I are pregnant with our third (and final!) baby, a girl, due in December. As we always planned to have three, we actually thought we’d have more than one opportunity to name a girl! However, our destiny was different, and we have two wonderful boys, Daniel William (Danny) and Thomas Andrew (Tommy) who were born in 2008 and 2011, respectively. Our last name is the English word for Klein, starts with an L.
Funny story about Daniel. The ultrasound technician told us at our 20-week scan that she thought we were having a girl, so we planned around a first-born girl, and chose the name Catherine Esther (after my husband’s mother Kathleen and my mother Esther). As it turned out, Catherine was a Daniel — which we found out long after the baby shower, unfortunately, which loaded us with ruffles, rainbows and pink! But had Daniel been a Catherine, and our second one also a girl, we would have named her Emma Elizabeth (my name is Elizabeth, and it’s also my mother’s middle name).
Now here we are pregnant with our last baby, and having trouble choosing a name. We still like the name Catherine (and aren’t sure what we like better), but this was very much the name associated with our first born (I can’t explain it, but it was a strange thing going through a pregnancy thinking you have a different baby inside you than the one who was born); now there’s a Duchess named Catherine; and now (coincidentally), our boys’ nanny is named Catherine. Also, we think the name Emma has gotten too popular in the interim. And although we like the name Elizabeth, my preference is not to have a baby with the same first name as mine.
I’ve also — since I was a girl — loved the name Penelope, or Poppy, for short. But my husband is not convinced that’s a first name — so we have essentially three names we’d consider as middle names, but no first names.
Finally, we are Americans living in Holland, so with Daniel and Thomas, we were deliberate about trying to pick names that are sort of universal, or at least understandable and recognizable in both languages.
Would you help us? We would so appreciate your advice, and also, in the event that we can’t decide amongst those three, we’d be grateful for your thoughts on giving a baby two middle names. Fun or troublesome??
Many thanks,
The Hollanders
When I was reading your letter and hadn’t yet come to the part about your first name being Elizabeth, my first thought with boys Daniel/Danny and Thomas/Tommy was sister Elizabeth/Betsy.
I feel inclined now to find something similar. I’m not familiar with how names sound/work in Dutch, but I’m thinking along the lines of something with a nickname such as Tessie, Milly, Josie, Sally, Sadie, Ruthie, Lettie, Lottie, Molly, Polly, Nellie.
Because I have both Sally and Sadie on the nickname list, Sarah is my first suggestion for first name. I know a child named Sarah with your same surname, and it continually strikes me as an adorable name. It sounds almost storybook-classic: charming without being overly whimsical. Daniel, Thomas, and Sarah; Danny, Tommy, and Sally/Sadie.
Molly and Polly may be too similar to Tommy anyway, but they also cause a slight problem as nicknames, since both are nicknames for Mary and I don’t think that’s widely known at this point. Still, Mary is my second suggestion: I think “Polly/Molly was originally a nickname for Mary” should be enough explanation for most people, and Polly is close to Poppy. Daniel, Thomas, and Mary; Danny, Tommy, and Molly/Polly. Oh, wait: as I say the names aloud, I find that my instinct is to say “Mary L_____ is/isn’t Very L_____.” Along with the unfamiliar-nicknames issue and similar-to-Tommy issue, that might be enough for me to say never mind. It’s not that it’s SUCH a bad thing or SO obviously an issue, it’s just that anytime something springs to my mind right away, I wonder if it will be something that will spring to EVERYONE’S mind, getting quite tiresome for the owner of the name.
Josephine feels more in line with Catherine/Emma than do Sarah and Mary, so that’s my third suggestion. Daniel, Thomas, and Josephine; Danny, Tommy, and Josie.
But let’s go back to the original choices for a minute. If your husband’s mother were named Catherine instead of Kathleen, I don’t think I could resist the appeal of honoring both grandmothers with one baby. Because your nanny is named Catherine and you strongly associate the name with your first pregnancy, I can see why it might be off the list at this point—but I can also see it being The Name: “I was SO SURE my baby was Catherine—and she WAS, she just decided to go to the back of the line!”
If Emma feels too popular, I wonder if you would like the name Emeline (or perhaps Emmie is too close to Tommy). Daniel, Thomas, and Emeline; Danny, Tommy, and Emmie.
Of the middle name options, I’m not sure which is my favorite. You’ve given compelling reasons for using each of them. I can at least contribute on the subject of having two middle names: I have two middle names and so do all five of my children. I’d confidently declare it to be no hassle at all—except that the reason it’s no hassle at this point is that a few hassles early on taught me how to avoid future hassles. But I can list all the hassles on one hand:
1. When Rob started school, they originally entered his first name as “Robert FirstMiddle”; I sent in a note to have that fixed, which they did.
2. For another child, I’ve forgotten which one, some paperwork was accidentally printed with “SecondMiddle Surname” as the surname. Again, I just mentioned it and it was fixed.
3. Occasionally an account will have room for only one initial. I wanted to choose a “default initial” for each of us, for consistency. This took a little bit of thought, of the kind I find interesting as opposed to burdensome.
4. Very occasionally (like fewer than five times total over nearly two decades), someone taking the information from me has acted eye-rolly about it. I find that intensely annoying. Considering how many people I know with two middle names, it should not be a big/surprising deal. Luckily, the eye-rolly reaction happens very very infrequently, and often from people who also act as if everything else, including my multiple-spellings first name and difficult-to-spell surname, were also chosen specifically to irritate/inconvenience them. So. I’m not sure this even counts as a hassle; I guess it’s more like a minor associated annoyance—along the lines of being annoyed that some forms only have room for one middle name.
Because of the first two hassles, I’ve learned to be quite clear when filling out paperwork, or when speaking to someone who is filling out the paperwork for me. So for example, if someone says “Middle name?,” I say, “He has two. Does the form have room for two, or just one?”; if they say “I can do both,” I give them both; if they say “Just one,” I give them the default middle name. Or if I’m filling out the form, and it’s a paper form, I will if necessary (like if it’s one long line for Full Name) draw little brackets and arrows to make things clear. For example, I might put a bracket around the two middle names with an arrow that says “two middle names”; I might add a note saying, “If only room for one, we use ______.”
When I write it all out like this, it looks like a hassle. In actual practice, it is so little hassle it tempts me to say it’s none—or at least no more hassle than dealing with a name being misspelled or two digits of our phone number being swapped. Once the forms have been filled out for each place that needs forms on the child, it’s done and doesn’t have to keep being done. And in general, we’ve found that people whose jobs involve filling out forms are unsurprised by the concept of having two middle names.
And it seems like an excellent solution in your case, where you have one baby girl and three great middle name ideas. I would choose between Esther and Elizabeth: I love the idea of using your mom’s name, and I love the idea of keeping the Elizabeth tradition going, but using both your mom’s names seems like too much honor for one person. (Using Elizabeth would spare you from any discomfort that might come from using one grandmother’s name and not the other’s, if you do choose not to use Catherine.) And then I’d use Penelope as the other middle name. The full name will end up long (which I love anyway, so it doesn’t feel like a downside to me even though I realize it can be), but will hardly ever be used in all its glory: my daughter’s name has a total of 12 syllables, but everywhere except her paperwork she’s known by just first/last name.
Or would your husband be more keen on the name Penelope if it came with the nickname Nellie or Penny (maybe too similar to Danny) instead of Poppy? Daniel, Thomas, and Penelope; Danny, Tommy, and Nellie. You could still also call her Poppy. With one middle name option removed, I’d be putting another right in its place: Kathleen. It avoids the nanny/duchess/first-pregnancy issues, and more directly honors your husband’s mother, and I think it makes a very pretty middle name. Penelope Elizabeth Kathleen L_____. I like the balance of the name, too: a name you’ve loved since you were little (but not a family name) as the first name; then, the Elizabeth tradition from your side of the family; then, your husband’s mother’s first name; then, your husband’s family surname (assuming it IS his family’s surname).