Dearest Swistle –
While my husband and I are *pretty* sure that the one baby is enough, I think about Theoretical Second Baby all the time.
And one of the things I think about, of course, is what TSB’s NAME would be.
When we named our daughter, we had three names that were Top Contenders. And one of those three still stands out to me as The Name That Got Away. Not that I don’t love my daughter’s name – oh no, I DO. Just that I would LOVE to name another daughter Name 2 from the Top Contenders list.
The thing is… If we WERE to have not just a second child but a second daughter, I think that Name 2 would be out of the running because it shares two syllables with my FIRST daughter’s name. And that’s what I wanted to email you about today, because I thought it might be fun.
At what point are names TOO SIMILAR to be sibling names?
Let’s say my daughter’s name is Gwendolyn, and that the Second Favorite name is Guinevere. Not quite true to life in terms of my own issue, but pretty close: The names begin with the same sound. The emphasis in both names is on that same sound. The nickname possibilities BOTH include that first syllable.
I mean, that to me seems like the biggest PROBLEM: the nicknames. Because even if at home you call the girls Dolly and Vera (or whatever), if their friends decide to call them each Gwen, you are in trouble. I suppose it’s unlikely that if you already had a sister going by Gwen that you’d ALSO agree to be called Gwen, but it’s still POSSIBLE. And this is a game of hypotheticals, after all.
But aside from that first syllable, the names are pretty different! So… are they different ENOUGH that they would work as a sibling set?
What if the names were Madeleine and Madison? Or Bridget and Britney? Or Elinore and Eloise? Or Luanne and Louise? Or Verdabelle and Veronica? Or Marilyn and Marianne? Or Isabella and Isadora?
I feel like there ARE some… boundaries. For instance, Susan and Suzanne seem MUCH too similar to work. Same goes for Mary and Maria, even though the first syllable of each is NOT quite the same. I guess in each case, they are variations on the same name. Maybe that’s the line of demarcation?
Is this all a matter of personal preference? Or are there some Naming Guidelines that can help in the decision making?
Just something I’ve been thinking about for, oh, ALMOST THREE YEARS. Perhaps it would be amusing to puzzle through with your readers.
Much love
I believe that yes, it boils down to personal preference. I am thinking of friends of my late mother-in-law, who deliberately named their daughters Sharon and Karen. Or a friend of a friend who has daughters Ella and Emma. Or of course there’s George Foreman, who named all five of his sons George. And then on the other end of the spectrum there are people who won’t even use two names that start with the same letter or have the same vowel sound.
I think you’re right that MOST people would would have drawn a line by the time we got to two names with the same nickname, or two names that were (or sounded as if they were) variations of the same name. I’ll bet too that most of us feel more strongly about repeated beginnings and rhyming endings than we do about repeated endings (non-rhyming) and rhyming beginnings. And there are other things that can make names feel more/too similar, such as looking similar (even if the sounds are different), or having the same number of syllables, or having the same beginning and ending letters. And of course there’d be exceptions all over the place, for every line we might draw!
Some issues feel like issues during the naming process, but turn out to be a big shrug afterward. For example, I have uncles Jim and Tim. I can imagine thinking rhyming nicknames made the names too close, but it doesn’t feel like a big deal at all now that it’s happened: just a mildly interesting similarity. I still might prefer not to do it with my own kids’ names, unless I loved the name too much to give it up.
I think love factors in very strongly. If you are still thinking of a name several years later, you may decide to go with the “No one REALLY CARES what anyone names their children” philosophy and/or the “Well, it’ll work out, one way or another!” philosophy, and just GO for it. Or you might end up thinking of it as a name you loved nearly as much as the name you used, but unfortunately you could only use one or the other. I have names like that on my list: for example, I love the names Wilson and William, but I was only going to use one or the other. I love Elizabeth and Eliza, but again, only wanted one to use one or the other; I love Edward and Edmund, same deal. Edward and Theodore, that’s more of a flexible area for me, even though both could be Ted. Elizabeth and Eleanor too: I suppose they could both want to use Ellie, but for whatever reason it doesn’t bother me.
Well! It’s a very interesting topic! I’d love to hear where everyone else draws lines, and about pairings that felt too similar or NOT too similar to use!