Dear Swistle,
I am a long time reader and fan of your blog(s), and am now calling for you for advice with naming our fourth and final child, a girl, due in three weeks (because what better time than a pandemic to have a baby?). I am going to apologize for the length of this email, but want to give you lots of detailed info. The short version of the dilemma is that I LOVE the names our first three kids have, and cannot settle on a name that 1) I equally love for this last baby and 2) checks all the boxes that I care about.
Here are all of the nitty gritty details: Our last name is S1aughter, my maiden name is Ke11y. I’m of Irish and Jewish descent, and my husband is all WASP. Our older children, in birth order, are Teddy (full name Edward Hain Ke11y S1aughter), Ellie (full name Eloise Ruth S1aughter – and sometimes we call her Ellie Rue), and Pippa (Philippa Hope S1aughter).
The criteria we try to meet are the following:
– Style: obviously, we like names that sound a little like british nobility. But we particularly like that they are all names that are not super duper common but still widely known. And all a little old fashioned.
– Nickname potential: We want the kids to have names that give them options – if they don’t like what we choose to call them, they have other options. So all of them go by nicknames now, but have long-form names they could use as an alternative, or could use middle names, etc. And, in fact, for each of them we settled on the nickname well before we decided what it would be short for – so for example we wavered between Theodore and Edward for Teddy, and Philippa and Penelope for Pippa.
– Working with our last name: Obviously, S1aughter can be tough. Makes it hard to use names that end in “s” sounds (though we broke this rule for Eloise), and rules out any real words as first names (like, if we hadn’t used Hope as a middle name already I would love that except Hope S1aughter feels a little dark…)
– Honoring family: each of the kids have names that honor specific family members; it is also particularly important to me that my heritage and family be reflected in first/middle names since they all have my husband’s last name. So, specifically, my son has an E-name to honor my late uncle Eugene, and in fact largely shares initials with my uncle (my uncle was EHK, Teddy is EHKS). Hain is a family name on my mother’s side and he also has my last name as a second middle name.* Ellie’s names come from her two grandmothers’ middle names: my mom’s middle name is Louise (close to Eloise) and Ruth is my mother in law’s middle name. Pippa is named for my great-aunt Phyllis (the only one of my maternal grandmother’s siblings not to have a niece/nephew named after her) and Hope is a nod to my paternal grandmother Joy (Joy is also my middle name).– For this fourth baby, in addition to the general criteria above, we would love to honor our dads with this name. Our dads are Kevin Vincent (mine) and Howel William (my husband’s). Since none of their names have direct female equivalents (except William) our thought was to use initials, and my husband would really like his dad’s name to be in the first name position. So that means initials of either H___ K___ or W___ V____.
The short list that we have so far is:
-Harriet Katherine, nn Hattie (or Hattie Kate). This is the frontrunner to which I cannot commit. Pros are that it checks all the boxes, with the bonus of extra family connections on my side: Harriet/Hattie was the mother of a very beloved second cousin of mine, and Katherine was my dad’s Irish grandmother (though she was Catherine with a C). Also Harriet has lots of excellent historical and literary references. Cons are that I don’t really LOVE it; it feels less pretty than our other girls names and I worry it sounds too old ladyish. I do love Hattie, but is that too many -ie sound endings among our kiddos?
– Hazel Katherine. Pros are same as the above without any of the benefits of Harriet in terms of familial or historical reference. But maybe I like it more? Cons are no obvious nickname, maybe too trendy, none of the benefits of Harriet.
– Willa Violet. Pros are that I love the names, especially Willa. And Willa is obviously directly linked to William. Family resonance is sort of a wash- there are Williams on both sides of the family, which is good, but there are complicated feelings about some of them. And other than the V-initial, Violet is definitely new on our family trees. Cons are that there is no obvious nickname, plus the limited family references (like, there is nothing remotely Jewish about that name).There aren’t a lot of other H/K/W/V names we are excited about.
My husband seems very happy with Harriet/Hattie, and could live with the other two. The problem is really me, and my inability to just settle on Harriet/Hattie. He also cares substantially less about my “rules” than I do, though does care about honoring family. When we’ve roadtested with friends and family, friends tend to LOVE Harriet/Hattie, though my parents definitely did not like it (though appreciated its efforts to honor their families)
As you often correctly note, no naming rules have to be hard and fast, so maybe we toss them out and just pick other names we love? If we were doing that, our list would include:
– Ada/Addie (Ada was my maternal grandmother)
– Alice
– Anne/Annie
– Beatrice
– Daisy
– Georgia
– June
– Magnolia/Maggie/Maisie/Mae
– RosieI’d love your thoughts. Should I just get over whatever is holding me back on Harriet? Is it in fact a lovely name that I’m just not hearing that way right now but will be adorable on a baby? Or are their other names we should be considering, especially H/K/V/W names? Or ways to meet all our criteria we should think of?
With gratitude,
Pregnant in Quarantine
* We didn’t give the girls two middle names or my surname. Teddy got it in part because of the symmetry with my uncle’s initials and in part because the fourth name felt more sustainable for a boy, by which I mean that when i got married I wanted to share a name with my husband but didn’t want to drop either my middle or my maiden name, so just tacked S1aughter on to the end. But having four names is annoying enough and I didn’t want my daughters to have to grapple with five.
If this were your first daughter, I’d have a couple of paragraphs here on the topic of whether girls should be named differently than boys based on assumptions about their future marriages and future marriage-based name changes. Since this is the third daughter, it seems better to keep going with the same type of name her sisters have (especially since that type of name is the usual first/middle/last), and maybe change the explanation: perhaps it was the FIRSTBORN who got the extra/maiden name, not the boy-who-is-not-a-girl-and-so-would-not-need-to-think-ahead-to-any-name-change-at-marriage.
I will say in general, for others reading this post, that I don’t think girls should be given names that (1) assume they’ll get married, (2) assume they’ll marry men, and (3) assume they’ll change their names at all, let alone in a particular way. And we do future generations a service when we root out the default assumption that men don’t change their names and women do. Oh, look, it turned out I had a couple of paragraphs on the topic anyway. (But they were shorter and less bossy than they would have been!)
On to the rest of the letter.
In some ways, it can get easier to name each additional child: the process gets more familiar, the preferences get refined, the parents work out a good system for making the decision together. Also, the parents have had a chance to see how some of the anxieties of the naming process (“But this name repeats the dog’s initial!”) don’t matter much later on, and how early naming concerns (“But Margaret feels like Too Big a Name for this tiny newborn!”) settle down as the name gets comfortable from familiarity and daily use and perhaps a transitional nickname such as Ms. Pants.
In other ways, the process gets much more challenging, as choosing certain names gradually rules out using more and more of the remaining options. This will vary from parent to parent, but for example perhaps using the name Eva rules out using Evan, Ivan, Eli, Everett, Ezra, Evelyn, Geneva, and Genevieve. Some parents might not want to repeat an initial, or might not want two flower/virtue/month/-en names in the sibling group. Sometimes as the sibling group grows, the naming style feels more cohesive and parents get more reluctant to choose something from a different style category. Or parents run out of favorite names, or run out of honor names, or feel locked in to a particular pattern, or whatever.
In any case, the pool of names to choose from gets smaller and smaller with each named child. And so in general, my feeling is that it is a good idea if possible to get more relaxed and flexible as the sibling group grows: the kind of symmetry and balance that is easily achievable with two children gets increasingly challenging, perhaps even unachievable/undesirable, with four or five. I notice a lot of letters from parents restricting their name choices to the point where they are only allowing themselves to choose from a tiny group of names they don’t even like very much: at some point, the preference for coordinated sibling names (a preference I strongly share, so I am sympathetic) backs them into a corner.
In the very first paragraph, I start to wonder if you are having this exact problem. You love your first three kids’ names, and you can’t find a fourth name that you love AND that checks all your boxes.
Then you go on to give us the list of boxes, which is a pretty reasonable list, though I would still be advising the usual willingness to bend or drop one or more of the preferences.
But THEN you say that in addition to wanting to love the name AND check all those boxes, you ALSO want to name your daughter after two men—and that your husband wants his father’s name first. That is the part where my mouth actually dropped open. It’s too much. It’s too much! Maybe there IS a name that meets all those requirements AND ALSO you’ll love it, but it sounds to me like you have looked very carefully and are very familiar with this process, and you’re not finding it, so we are not likely to find it, either. It isn’t as if there are very many H and W names to go through; we’re not going to find a name you’ve overlooked.
Something has to give. Boy, I’d really like to start by dropping the preference that she be named after both of her grandfathers and in a specific order. That is a really next-level challenge to add to a fourth child’s name on top of everything else. Going to all of this trouble and sacrifice in order to give her a name starting with the same initial as your husband’s father’s middle name seems…not worth it, honor-wise. Could we go back in time and say that the names Hope and Hain already honor your father-in-law by using his initial, and that Ke11y already doubly honors your father by matching his initial AND being his surname? It seems very symmetrical: each grandfather is already represented twice.
At the very least, I think the preference of honoring your husband’s father with the first name should be dropped, and K and V should be added as first-name initial choices. I further think you should add the option of using one grandfather’s middle initial for the first name paired with the other grandfather’s first initial for the middle name, for balance. This takes a set of restrictions that forces you to choose ONLY among H.K. and W.V. names (the jaw drops afresh), and lets it at least be a choice among H.K., W.V., K.H., V.W., V.H., and W.K. names, which is PLENTY DIFFICULT ENOUGH.
Furthermore, some of your other honor names have not been initial-based: Eloise to honor Louise, Hope to honor Joy, a family surname. Is it possible to widen the net even further by allowing similar honors for the two grandfathers? Is there a family surname (their mothers’ maiden names?), or a name that is in some other way similar to the names in question? Eva or Ivy or Evelyn for Kevin? Lavinia or Vina for the -vin- in both Kevin and Vincent? Willemina for William? Ella or any -el/-elle name for Howel? What if you chose a first name you loved, and then used an H-K middle name such as Hazel-Kate? I am not keen on such reaches for honor names, but I also feel like we are trapped in a very tight corner here, and we are not going to lift the preference for honoring the grandfathers, then we should do everything we can to gain even a single inch more wiggle-room.
Well, in the meantime, let’s look at the names on the finalist list. First, I think the name Harriet is great. That doesn’t mean you will/should feel the same about it, but I think it’s fantastic. I mentioned it just the other day in a list of names that gave me a thrilled shock the first time I heard them on a child. Edward (Teddy), Eloise (Ellie), Philippa (Pippa), and Harriet (Hattie) is a very pleasing group, and makes my heart happy to look at it, and I like the way the name Harriet gives some new sounds. I know I’m advising you to drop preferences, but it DOES please me the way it checks all your boxes anyway, and to see all those additional honor-name elements (the 2nd cousin’s mother, the great-grandmother). I like the two groupings: Edward, Eloise, Philippa, Harriet; Teddy, Ellie, Pippa, Hattie. Lovely. Nice work. Don’t choose it only because it meets all the preferences—but if you DO come around to it and love it, I think it’s a great name.
Willa goes the other way: instead of adding new sounds, it repeats them, and that gives a different effect that appeals to me in a different way. Teddy, Ellie, Pippa, Willa—that makes a little satisfying Venn diagram in my mind of repeated sounds/letters/syllables, and of course all those doubled letters. It would displease me a little to be seeing these overlaps between one child’s given name and all the children’s nicknames—except that since Willa wouldn’t have an obvious nickname, I think it actually helps blur that distinction and make it less of an issue: her given name fits with her siblings’ given names AND with their nicknames. It sounds like your main hesitation is with Violet. If you instead go for the balance of one grandfather’s MIDDLE initial as the FIRST name and the other grandfather’s FIRST initial as the MIDDLE name, that opens up K. Does it make anything fall into place if you can use Willa Katherine?
Hazel is nice, and pleasingly similar to in look/letters to Howel. I like the way it pulls in the Z-sound of Eloise after a break for Philippa: Edward, Eloise, Philippa, Hazel. I agree with your assessment that it doesn’t seem as if it adds enough to outrank the pros of using Harriet—but that opinion stands only if you find you continue to only maybe like it more.
And after saying I wasn’t going to find any names you’d overlooked, I’m still going to mention one of my own favorite W names, which I think goes so beautifully in this sibling group, I almost can’t stand to mention it: if I never mention it, you can never tell me you already thought of it and rejected it. Well, here it is: Winifred. I love it so, so much. And look at it with the other names: Edward, Eloise, Philippa, and Winifred; Teddy, Ellie, Pippa, and Winnie. The W. to honor your father-in-law without getting other family Williams involved. And then Katherine as the middle name: if your dad is going to get honored in the middle-name position, it makes sense to balance the honor by using his first initial. Winifred Katherine; Winnie Kate.
I don’t want to mention any downsides to the name, because I want you to choose it—but I found I couldn’t leave them out: I don’t consider either one of them a deal-breaker, but I would still want to have thought of them before using the name, rather than after. The first is that if she wants to use the nickname Freddie, which is one of the things I like about the name Winifred, I wonder if that’s too horror movie with the surname. The second is that Freddie rhymes with Teddy. I don’t care very much about issues with nicknames, and especially when those nicknames can easily be avoided if the issues bother anyone—but, again, I like to have thought of those issues beforehand.
Name update:
Dear Swistle,
I have long owed you an update after your excellent and helpful advice on naming baby number four. I will confess that I am only now getting to it not only because of [gestures around] all that is going on, but also because I was honestly embarrassed by your totally appropriate call-out on different naming plans for boys and girls. I actually agree with everything you said – I do not (1) assume my daughters will get married, (2) assume they’ll marry men, and (3) assume they’ll change their names at all, let alone in a particular way. Nor, for that matter, do I assume my son will get married/to a woman/keep his name. I think I just articulated myself poorly in a failed effort to be concise (plus, I probably let some latent unconscious sexism rise to the surface). I think my real thing is that over time since my son was born and since I’ve been filling out many forms for myself and him and dealing with inconsistent application of middle vs last names, I’ve increasingly found having four names cumbersome. BUT ANYWAY you were right to call me out and I appreciated it.
Now on to this delicious little baby! Your advice was very helpful, both as a sounding board for the names we had on our list and in telling me to stop making it so difficult for myself. Let me first say that I actually LOVE your suggestion of Winifred, and especially Winnie, and it would already have been on my list because it’s great…except that Winnie was the name of a beloved family dog, and therefore felt like we couldn’t use it. But your validation of Harriet helped me see the name through others’ eyes a little better and come to like it more.
And taking your advice, I decided to relax some of my thinking and returned to the family tree to ponder a bit more. And I noticed for the first time that my dad’s parents could provide the solution: his father was named Lew, and his mother’s middle name was Lucille. My aha moment was Lucy! Lucy would honor my dad by honoring his two parents, and bonus that my husband and I both loved the name. I was also willing to let go of naming order (which I made in my letter sound like it was something my husband was pushing, but I don’t really think that was fair to him; he is substantially more flexible on all things and if anything had expressed a weak preference which I turned into a rule and then just cancelled over no protest from him whatsoever).
So we spent some time wrestling between Harriet Lucy and Lucy Harriet, and were genuinely torn! In fact, we went into the hospital and through the birth undecided. But then our sweet baby girl had to spend a stressful 24 hours (away from me, but without my husband leaving her side) in the special care nursery (during a pandemic, which was not directly relevant at all but made everything more stressful). She is absolutely fine, but at the time it felt very scary. She was unnamed when they took her away, but I quickly decided that Harriet Lucy felt more like the name of a tough little fighter (I don’t pretend this is rational – I was on a lot of drugs and very emotional). And it was settled!
The name seems to fit her quite well. We mostly call her Hattie, (or Hattie Lou, which is a nice little mirror of her oldest sister whom we call Ellie Rue sometimes). But she already seems like a sweet and sassy little Harriet too.
Here is Hattie at three months, spiky hair and all. Thanks again for your help!