Category Archives: name update

Baby Girl Smith, Sister to Saylor and Grayson

Dear Swistle,

We need help on a baby name! The closer it gets the further we feel. I know it’s a case of over thinking and we might need to take a step back. But I am starting to panic that the big day will arrive and we will have nothing. I am dying to find a name we are excited about and start bonding with.

Our current children are:
Saylor Grace (girl) and Grayson Davis (boy – mostly goes by Gray). We are expecting our third and final – another girl!

So we need a sister for Saylor and Gray.

Our last name is Smith. Because of this, we really like names that are not trendy/popular/common. My husband was literally one of 3 Matt Smith’s in his high school. And I would prefer for her not to be known as “Emily S” (for example) in her kindergarten class.

Also, we would like to use the middle name Ellen if possible to honor my sister.

We are struggling to find a name that fits well with Saylor. I know people will have mixed opinions on this name but we love it and it fits our girl perfectly – she is spunky, smart, independent, cute, confident, and strong willed. We like that we have only come across a handful of them. We are NOT looking for a nature name like Clover or something.

At first we thought we were set on Hadley, and it is still my husbands first choice. But I worry that the ‘ey’ ending makes it way more feminine than Saylor. I think I can get over that for the right name. But I also strongly worry that Hadley is gaining in popularity, especially where we live.

I have always loved the name Maren. But I am struggling with the spelling. Maren, Marin, Merrin, or Maryn. (Maryn fits best visually with Saylor and Gray but I’m worried about the y being trendy. Although it doesn’t feel trendy to me with Saylor, probably because I’m her mom).

Other names on our list that we don’t BOTH necessarily love but haven’t vetoed:

Merritt
Finley
Lainey
Maisey
Hazel
Farrah
Ellis
Arden
Karis or Charis
Tessa

And sometimes I just want to chuck it all and name her Lucy. I like the name! But then I remember: Saylor, Gray, and Lucy really don’t fit together.

I know that Piper, Morgan, or Payton would probably fit but I can’t make myself love any of these. I love Marlo but my husband does not.

Would love your thoughts or any other suggestions. Thank you so much!
Erica

 

One thing I notice is that all four names you’ve used so far feature an -ay- sound: Saylor, Grace, Grayson, and Davis. I don’t think you need to continue this (unless that would be fun), but it tells me that you like that sound. If you did want to go with that, you already have three names of that sort on your list: Lainey, Maisey, and Hazel. My favorite of the three as a sister name for Saylor is Lainey, so I’d probably vote for Lainey Hazel. Or if you wanted a rhythm similar to Saylor’s name, you could do Lainey Kate, Lainey Paige, Lainey Kay, Lainey Mae, etc. Oh oh oh, I just had a fun idea: since you’ve used both Grace and Grayson, you could do Lainey Grey. Probably too much since Grayson goes mostly by Gray, but it still seems fun to me. Well, I see you’d like to use the middle name Ellen anyway, so then it would be Saylor Grace, Grayson Davis, and Lainey Ellen.

With Saylor, I like the sister name Hadley even more. I don’t think the ending makes it more feminine than Saylor. Saylor/Sailor is a name currently used mostly for girls in the U.S. (409 new baby girls and 46 new baby boys in 2013), and because the only one I know of is Christie Brinkley’s daughter, it hits my brain as “girl”: I might not use a super-ultra-feminine sister name with it, but Hadley feels to me like the same basic level of femininity. You’re right, though, about its increasing popularity:

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

I think it feels even more popular because of all the other popular -ad- names: Madison, Addison, Madelyn, Adelyn, Maddie, Addie.

Unless you wanted to deliberately play up the marine theme (and you very well might, if the sea is important to you), I don’t think I’d use Maren with Saylor. If you do use it, the spelling Maryn makes me think first of the pronunciation with the emphasis on the second syllable (which may be what you’re going for): ma-RINN. Ever since someone told me that Marin County in California is pronounced that way, the spelling Marin is another that makes me think ma-RINN. Maren, probably because of its similarity to Karen, makes me think of the MARE-in pronunciation, as does Merrin.

If you love the name Lucy, I don’t see any reason you can’t use it. I too prefer sibling names to coordinate, but I’d definitely consider that a preference rather than a requirement, and I’d reconsider for the right name. However, another of your preferences is low popularity, and the name Lucy is more popular than Hadley: #66 in 2013, and that doesn’t even count all the Lucilles and Lucias and Lucianas going by Lucy.

A name that comes to mind is Padgett. Padgett Ellen Smith; Saylor, Grayson, and Padgett.

Another is Larkin. Larkin Ellen Smith; Saylor, Grayson, and Larkin.

Another is Darcy. Darcy Ellen Smith; Saylor, Grayson, and Darcy. That gives you a Y per child.

 

 

Name update!

Hi Swistle,

This update is overdue but I wanted to let you and your readers know that our baby girl arrived in March. We named her Hadley Jane Ellen.

As we got closer to her arrival, Jane became a name very high on our list because of it’s meaning (God’s gracious gift) and how fitting this was for her life.  Jane is also my middle name. We were still drawn to Ellen to honor my sister and we still loved Hadley and felt it fit the most with her siblings. So we went with two middle names!

Hadley is just precious and we all love her to pieces! Thanks to everyone for their input.

IMG_8443-30

Baby Girl Durham, Sister to Leah Alexandra

Dear Swistle,
Our baby girl is due on Dec 23. We still have not decided on a name. Our last name is Durham with an “n” instead of an “r”. Big Sister’s name is Leah Alexandra (her middle name is honouring my amazing grandma). Little sister’s middle name will likely be Margaretta, after my husband’s grandma. We both also like Christine as a middle name.
We like classic, but not overused names. Our problem is, most of the first names we like either seem too similar to Leah or have confusing spelling.
Here is a list we started with:
-Clara (my husband does not like as much as our other choices)
-Jessica (same as above)
-Tessa (our current favourite, but I am not 100% sure)
-Christina (I really like it, but we are likely to shorten it and I don’t like Tina or Chrissy)
-Alisa (we both like it, but is it too similar to Leah? This spelling is common in my home country and I always liked it, but she’d probably have to always spell it here)
-Kiera (we both like it, but again, would she have to spell it every time?)

So this leaves us with the three top choices: Tessa, Alisa, or Kiera. We’d love to hear your thoughts. Thank you!

Anya.

 

I do think Kiera would lead to constant spelling issues; I kept having to look back at the letter to see if I had it right, and I STILL got it wrong in the poll and had to fix it. Pronunciation is another issue: is it two syllables (KEER-rah) or three (kee-AIR-ah)? If it’s the same as Keira, Keira is currently the more common spelling in the United States: 443 new baby girls named Kiera in 2013, and 1,559 new baby girls named Keira.

If Alisa is pronounced ah-LEE-sah, then it does sound very similar to Leah to me. LEE-ah and ah-LEE-sah. I think too that it would be confused with Alyssa and Elise.

For classic-but-not-overused and a relatively easy spelling, I think Tessa is the best from your list. I like it with both middle name options, too.

Let’s see what everyone else thinks!

[yop_poll id=”61″]

 

 

 

Name update!

Hi Swistle,

Our little girl Tessa Margaretta arrived on December 30! Thanks so much for your thoughts (and your readers’ thoughts) on our name question. Her name suits her beautifully.

Best wishes,

Anya

Tessa 2 days old

Baby Girl Cox, Sister to Matthew, Holly, and Lilah

Hi Swistle,

I have been reading your blog the past couple months since a friend suggested it to me. I found it very interesting and different from many baby name blogs I checked out. So here is my dilemma. We are expecting our fourth next week! December 10th and still can’t seem to settle on a name. Our children’s names are Matthew Christopher, Holly Evelyn-Rose, Lilah Anneliese with the last name Cox. We are having a girl. The problem is my husband likes to pick almost all 80’s names. He especially likes my names Kristen (which is my middle name) or he would even name her Heather which is my first. I definitely prefer not to have Heather in her name. Kristen I am ok with but not sure I love. His other picks are Jessica, Amy and Rachelle. He has mentioned liking Sophia, Gabriella and flower names like Lily and at one time Daisy and Violet (I think Violet was too out there for him). He used to like Dahlia (not sure what nicknames are associated with that name), but has since changed his mind. I don’t mind Dahlia and it also has the Ls and Hs the other girls have in their names (not that it has too). I don’t care for Lily (seems a very popular choice right now like Sophia). Last night he mentioned liking Grace. This is a name I previously asked him about and he said no. I can’t keep up with him. The only way we usually find something is having him come up with names and then me picking one of them out.
My preferred names are Tessa, Noelle (I like Noelle as a middle name) or Maisy. I like older classic names and newer names, but not a big 80’s fan.
This is our fourth and most likely final child…. So I really hope we can find a solution. Help!

Thank you for your time,
Heather

 

I find it very pleasing that your husband likes my name, and so I will use a sweet voice as I steer him away from it. I like my name, too, but it is a Mom Name now—and one very tied to its time period. I would be enthusiastic about you and your daughter sharing a middle name, though, so I admit I’m hoping Kristen works with the chosen first name. Heather would also make a pretty middle name.

Lily and Violet both seem to me to be too close in sound to Lilah; Lily and Holly also have a similar sound, as do Dahlia and Lilah. Grace seems wonderful, if you’re still interested in it. Paul too did a complete turnaround on a name, vetoing it for the first child and picking it as his favorite for the second child. I didn’t even mention that to him, I just said “YES, great, it’s settled!” Matthew, Holly, Lilah, and Grace.

Jessica and Tessa are so similar in sound, as are Amy and Maisy, as are Daisy and Maisy, as are Rachelle and Noelle, it gives me hope that we can find something you’ll both like.

If you wanted to continue with the L sounds, I think Noelle would be my first choice for a first name: Holly, Lilah, and Noelle. Each girl has two syllables and a strong L sound, but different beginnings and endings.

Or Jillian: Holly, Lilah, and Jillian.

Or Alice: Holly, Lilah, and Alice.

Or Claudia, if you don’t mind the alliteration. Holly, Lilah, and Claudia.

Or Elise: Holly, Lilah, and Elise.

Or Juliet: Holly, Lilah, and Juliet.

Or Lydia, if that doesn’t seem too close to Lilah: Holly, Lilah, and Lydia. That does start tangling up when I say it.

Because your husband likes some of the mom names, and because Holly and Tessa and Noelle are used now but were also used in my era, I’m inclined to look in the Baby Name Wizard‘s New Classics category. Names like Sabrina and Miranda are newer and older at the same time. Vanessa, too: that one reminds me of both Tessa and Jessica. Bridget isn’t in that category in the book, but I’d add it: I can picture a Bridget my age or my daughter’s age. Same with Marissa.

If Sophia is too popular, I wonder if you’d like Josephine or Fiona.

Or I wonder if you’d like Nora. Matthew, Holly, Lilah, and Nora.

Or Phoebe? Matthew, Holly, Lilah, and Phoebe.

 

 

Name update!

Hi Swistle,

I appreciate your help and your insight into our dilemma. I went into labor early and had the baby Dec 4th. We decided Teresa “Tessa” Kristen. She will go by Tessa. I found out that my husband didn’t mind the name Tessa but he couldn’t conceive of giving her a first name that he considers a nickname. So I looked up names that Tessa is derived from and we agreed upon Teresa (no H per his request). So it will now be Matthew, Holly, Lilah and Tessa. I really appreciate your time and input. I didn’t realize, until you pointed it out, that we liked many similar sounding names. I have also referred many of my friends to your blog :)

Thank you again,
Heather

TK

Baby Boy or Girl Seewald-without-the-S, Sibling to Urban, Charles, Levi, and Matthias

I’m 34 weeks along now, with baby #5 (due 1/3/15). Our boys are Urban, Charles, Levi, and Matthias. Gender of Baby #5 is unknown. Our last name is like SEE-wald (without the S). I’m Kim, and my husband is Brian.

If the baby is a boy, he’ll be Thomas. We haven’t settled on a middle name yet. I’m leaning towards using my mom’s maiden name (Larson) because we’ve managed to honor all our parents EXCEPT my mom with our other boys’ names. My husband, however, is insisting that we should just use her first name, Lynn, because (he says), “Lynn is really a boys’ name.” I say it USED to be a boy name but it is now very much in the girl name camp, and there isn’t any good reason to saddle our kid with a feminine-sounding middle name, especially when Larson is a perfectly respectable name on its own. What do you and your readers think? Am I right that Lynn is too feminine for a boy, even as a middle name?

As far as possible girl names, I finally got my husband to talk about the whole subject and make his own list. What a depressing exercise THAT was. I had so many lovely names I liked, and he has rejected nearly all of them, including my two favorites (Amy and Noelle). Let me show you his list:

*Theresa (nickname Tess or Tessa)

*Natalia – I like this for the Christmas connection, but it sounds too “foreign” to me; also, my best friend has a little girl named Natalie, so unless I loved this name to pieces, I would not go for it

*Georgia

*Isolde

*Margaret (probable nickname Greta) – also on my list, but I don’t know if I love it

*Marigold – also on my list, but I have a hard time picturing it on a real live person

*Amaryllis (possible nickname Rilla) – also on my list, but ditto what I said about Marigold, above; Amaryllis flowers are usually forced to bloom indoors in winter at Christmastime, though, so I do like that connection a lot

*Marietta (nickname Etta) – not on my own list, but I like it enough to consider

*Lucille (nickname Lucy) – LUCIA is on my list, for the saint whose feast day Scandinavians celebrate on December 13th (I’m part Swedish), but he likes Lucille better; I think Lucille sounds horrible with our last name

*Hannah – ANNA is on my list, but he likes Hannah better. I have at least FIVE good reasons why I prefer Anna over Hannah (though I don’t dislike Hannah at all)

*Esther

*Naomi – nice name, but with our last name it’s WAY too many vowels

My husband is also perfectly willing to use Irene or Helen (two of our grandmothers’ names) for a first name. I’m not a fan of Helen or any of its variations/derivatives, but I don’t know if I like Irene enough to use it for a first name. So I’m mostly thinking of these two names (and my mom’s name, Lynn) as potential middles.

It would be nice if everyone in our family had their own first initial, but if we did this, it would eliminate anything starting with M or L. If I strike out the names on Brian’s list that I don’t care for, that leaves us with …

Amaryllis

Hannah or Anna

Esther

I wish I was excited about one of these names, but I’m not. So maybe the “every man his own initial” preference needs to go out the window. Still, I find myself so unenthusiastic about our list. Why is that? Is it because this is probably our last baby (due to age – I’m 41)? Is it because IF the baby is a girl, she will be the only one, and I’ve set myself up to think her name needs to be something EXTRA SUPER SPECIAL and there just isn’t any one name that’s going to fit the bill? Is it just pregnancy hormones making me so desperate/depressed over this topic?

The other day I suggested Phillipa, which I LOVE, but Brian has rejected that, too. My trouble is, I have strong, positive associations with every name I like. I have REASONS for liking the names I like. My husband will reject or like a name without giving any REASONS for his preferences. How am I supposed to get on board with any of the names he prefers if he won’t tell me why he likes them? And then, too, I kind of get my feelings hurt when I tell him all the reasons I love a certain name and then he flat-out rejects it.

Truthfully, Swistle, I’ve been finding myself angry and resentful a lot when considering this whole “what to name the baby” dilemma. I know that’s terrible; naming a child should be a great joy! But other than our second son, Charlie, who basically got his name by default (grandpa names), my husband has named ALL our kids. He’s gotten HIS way EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. And I love our boys’ names – I do. But I feel like it’s MY TURN and like he should KNOW THAT and SAY THAT and be ACCOMMODATING TO THAT. I agree that both parents should assent to a name; I would not name our baby anything he truly hated. But I have this awful, sinking feeling that he is going to stubbornly cling to his own preferences and persist in rejecting every name I truly love, so that our boy will end up with a girly middle name or our girl will end up with a name I feel just ambivalent about.

Sorry for the long ramble. Can you help me get some perspective, Swistle, please oh please?

~ Kimberly

 

 

 

Name update!

Hi Swistle!

I wrote to you about three months ago for advice on naming my fifth child. Guess what?  We had a Christmas baby!  Born at 11 p.m. on 12/25/2014.  Another little boy, of course!  6 pounds, 2 ounces, and 19-3/4 inches long.  We named him Thomas Larson.  I’m attaching a recent picture.  He had to spend 19 days in the hospital due to some unforeseen medical issues, but he is doing wonderfully now, and his big brothers all love him to pieces (his dad and I do, too, naturally)!  Best Christmas present EVER. :-)

Thanks so much to all your readers for their great naming suggestions.  Especially thanks to everyone who pushed the name Amaryllis for if we had a girl.  I really fell in love with that name during the month of December, and two days before the baby was born, I told my husband that was the name I wanted to use.  He didn’t object!  I did tell him he could choose the middle name, though.  So if we’d had a daughter, her name probably would have been Amaryllis Helen or Amaryllis Irene … or Amaryllis Isolde!  Who knows.  We never did officially settle the matter.

Since wee Tommy came home, I find myself more open to girl names in general.  In other words, I don’t hear every girl name out there and think, “Blah.”  Instead, I think, “Ooh, pretty!”  If I ever have another baby, I think I would agonize a lot less over what to call a possible daughter.  And another boy?  Well, the sky’s the limit with names there!  I guess you could say I have a greater appreciation for names in general now.  I was just in a bad place for a while there when pregnant.

Life is so crazy these days, but I am looking forward to reading your blog on a regular basis again soon, as time permits.

Thanks again!

~ Kimberly

ThomasLarson

Baby Boy 0$term@n, Brother to Carys

Hi Swistle,

I’m a long time reader of your blog and planned to write in for help with my daughter, but ended up not needing it – because of you! I was introduced to her name (Carys) on your blog about a month before I got pregnant. It tugged at my heart and, by some miracle, DH liked it too. Even after saying it a million times over the last 3 years, I still feel a little jolt of excitement every time. And the name fits her perfectly – she’s spunky, frills-free, and beautiful inside and out (so far, anyway). It’s hard to compete with all that!

I think I need you this time. I’m having a BOY and am due in May. I know that’s a long way off, but boy names are impossible and I need time to “try on” all of the finalists for a little while. This is definitely our last planned child.

First, IF we can’t come up with anything else, he will likely be named Rich@rd J0$eph 0$term@n, 4th (sounds like Austermun). It’s a strong name, but there are problems with it. Most importantly, I’ve hated the name Richard since I met my first one at age 8. I’ve also known more Richards than any other name. DH goes by Eric (thankfully!) because his mom didn’t like it either and he’s always been annoyed by the disconnect between the names. Upon finding out his real name, EVERYONE asks why he goes by Eric (it’s a complete coincidence that they have the same root). Thus, he refuses to do the same to his son. I proposed we call him Joseph, but DH doesn’t like it. So, we’re left with RJ, which DH and MIL think sounds “down country” or whatever. DH doesn’t have strong feelings about using the name as he barely feels like it’s actually his name, but I’m sure we’ll get some pressure from FIL once we tell him it’s a boy (DH is the ONLY boy in his generation on either side of his family).

Because I’m a name nerd, I presented DH with a list of almost 200 names that I would be willing to consider, which I’d narrowed down from the 2013 SSA file of names used at least 5 times. DH eliminated more than half right away, including several of my favorites (Aidric, Clark, Cedric, Dashiell, Everett, Wesley) and then I eliminated more that I didn’t actually want to consider and we are left with a list of possible new favorites (at least for me and he hasn’t objected). It seems, however, that I have some sort of issue with each name…

Miles: it’s a distance measurement and I have a FB friend with an infant son named Miles – seems trendy

Theodore (Theo): not crazy about the meaning – we aren’t all that religious, also seems trendy

Alexander (I want to call him Alec, DH prefers Alex): the polar opposite of popularity and nn potential from Carys, which seems unbalanced

Elliot: seems trendy and Carys’ best friend at daycare has a little brother named Elliot. I’m not friendly with her mom, but it seems weird – although this leads to a cute story about Carys saying for a long time that she wanted her own Elliot

James (James): again, the polar opposite on popularity from Carys

Zachary: there are a couple in Carys’ classroom

Calvin (sometimes Cal): not sure Calvin 0$term@n has good flow, don’t like that it ends with -n

Evan: not sure it flows with 0$term@n, and I know a few little ones

Russell (sometimes Russ): reminds me of Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, though not really in a bad way (I thought Little Russ was cute when I was a kid); might be too stuffy?

Garrett: Carys and Garrett are too similar with their dominant sounds

Simon: same issues as Calvin

Even though he hasn’t gone so far as to say it, I think these are DH’s additional favorites: Dorian, Graham, Malcolm, Cullen (he had forgotten about Twilight and may have changed his mind after being reminded), Conrad, Caspian. I’m surprised by these, but he probably only likes them because they are connected to some video game or fantasy character.

I can’t figure out if meaning is important to me. It was with Carys, but only because I already loved the name. Felicity was our 2nd choice for her and I always thought it would be neat to name a 2nd daughter named Felicity so I could have “love” and “happiness” – cheesy, but adorable. I’m not sure if we would have gone with Felicity this time had he been a girl. We tried not to discuss names before finding out the sex.

I noticed after saying both names together a lot, that Eric and Carys have very similar sounds and it might be nice to get a name that has some sort of connection to my name (Michelle), which is one reason I like Dashiell. However, this is not that important in the end.

Middle name options are Richard or Kn0wle$ (my maiden name). Carys’ mn is Elizabeth after my MIL. I think I’d rather use Kn0wle$ to give a nod to my family, but it’s cumbersome with 0$term@n. Also, Richard seems so obvious because it gets 3 specific (and worthy) people.

I had been hoping to be able to find something as rare as Carys but not strange, just beautiful and interesting. Once people get that her name is Carys and not Cara or Carries, they love it. Unfortunately, DH eliminated my preferred rarities and I’m not sure I can handle his.

I guess I’m looking for help with arguments for and against these names and for advice on what works best with Carys. I’m also open to other suggestions, but feel like I’ve seen almost everything since I’m familiar with the entire SSA list.

Thanks for reading!

 

This is one of those opinions that’s really easy to give from a safe location outside the situation, but here it is anyway: if you hate the name Richard, and if your husband doesn’t care if he has a namesake or not and doesn’t like any nicknames/alternates for the name, then Richard should not be the default name. In fact, if I were you I would rule it out decisively right this minute. If necessary, your husband should go have a frank talk with his dad right now, so that the joy of your son’s birth is not compromised by anyone feeling shocked disappointment. It sounds like your father-in-law is the only one who wants this (though your mother-in-law may have a feeling of “Crud, why did I have to go through with that if the tradition was just going to die out anyway??”), and his vote is not strong enough to carry the day here. Scratch it off the list, I say! Scratch it off! End this silly tradition that is only being done because it’s a tradition and not because anyone wants the name! You are at least the second generation of mother who didn’t like the name. The tradition will end eventually anyway, and it might as well be with you guys.

Whew. Swistle should perhaps apply a little lavender oil to her temples until she can regain distance and perspective. She is getting a little bossy.

Ahem. What were we saying? Oh, yes: we were looking for a non-Richard name for this little boy. The next thing I’d consider is whether your husband’s family would appreciate having the blow softened, or not. Some families would feel a little better if you named the child Joseph, or gave him the middle names Richard Joseph (or just Richard), or gave him the initials R. J. but with different names (such as Russell James). Other families would feel that was insult added to injury. I think my own favorite, for a family that would feel better rather than worse, would be to choose a first name you love and then use Richard Joseph for the two middle names: ________ Richard Joseph 0$term@n. That way you get the entire Family Name, just with one part added (the new first name) and one part removed (the number at the end). It’s not The Same, but it’s Something.

Another possibility is to use a DIFFERENT male family namesake. The original Richard Joseph has been extensively honored at this point, as has his son, so now we could give someone else a turn. Your mother-in-law’s father? Your father? Either of the baby’s other grandfathers? A brother or uncle? This shows you’re not breaking a tradition of family honor, you’re just giving someone else a share of it.

Another fun possibility to consider, if it works with the first name choice, is to give your son the name Eric as his middle name: not your husband’s given name, but the name your husband feels is his name—and probably the name he would in fact have been given if your mother-in-law and father-in-law weren’t following a tradition.

This makes it fun to consider the name Leo, so that his first name and his initials would be the same. I also think Leo is very nice with Carys. Leo Eric 0$term@n; Carys and Leo.

Or perhaps these sorts of ideas won’t work for your husband’s family, or won’t work with the names you’d like to use, in which case we’re starting from scratch. You’ve done such careful research already, I’m reluctant to make suggestions: it seems like anything I’d suggest, you’d have already thought of. However, we’ve noticed before on this blog that sometimes hearing the idea supported by others can make a difference.

For example, if you like Miles, but you don’t like that it’s also a noun and also the name of a Facebook friend’s baby, I wonder if you’d like Milo? Perhaps you long since eliminated Milo for other reasons. But I love it with Carys. Milo Eric 0$term@n; Carys and Milo.

I don’t worry very much about name meanings. I suppose I might hesitate if a name meant something very unpleasant, but many, many names have been assigned religious meanings I don’t bat an eye at. People who ARE religious may get extra satisfaction out of using those names, but I don’t worry that anyone will think those meanings were intended. My own name means Christian, and yet I don’t feel as if anyone I met would think that was on purpose, or that it would communicate anything about my religious preferences.

Both Theodore and Miles are in style, but neither one seems trendy to me: they’re both doing the thing names with long histories do, where they come gently in and out of style with the years.

I think if you were having a daughter and considering the name Isabella, I might have concerns about the popularity/nickname gap between that name and the name Carys. For a sibling of the other sex, it doesn’t bother me at all. Many people have different styles for boy names and girl names, so if I met a Carys and an Alexander-called-Xan (or whatever), I wouldn’t think it was odd. A bigger hesitation for me is that the two of you prefer different nicknames. Some couples can work around that, and others can’t.

I feel the same way about the popularity of James: Carys and James seems like a perfectly reasonable sibling set to me. I like it.

I think of Isaac as “the next Zachary.” Isaac 0$term@n; Carys and Isaac.

Elliot goes into the Theodore/Miles category for me: not trendy, just a name with a long history having another turn being in style. I think the connection to Carys’s best friend’s brother is sweet.

Or would you like Emmett?

While I generally prefer to avoid repeated endings, I think it’s significantly different when there are different numbers of syllables. If your name were 0$tm@n, I might feel like Evan 0$tm@n and Simon 0$tm@n and Calvin 0$tm@n were a little choppy (though still okay to use). Because your surname instead has three syllables, I think it gives the name a nice tied-together sound, and I like all three name possibilities.

Russell stands out to me as an excellent choice with Carys. It has a similar level of unexpectedness yet familiarity, which seems like it’s one of your preferences. Plus, it sounds a little like your name, which would be fun because of the Carys/Eric thing. I know a Russell the same age as one of my kids, and his name has struck me again and again as being very usable and pleasing.

I’d also take Graham and Malcolm from your husband’s unofficial list. They too have that nice combination of unexpected and familiar.

Another option to sound somewhat like your name would be Mitchell. It looks quite a bit like Michelle, but the sounds are quite different. Mitchell 0$term@n; Carys and Mitchell.

I think you have a great list, and that at this point I’d suggest letting all the names simmer for awhile. Maybe do some ranking games, where you and your husband each pick your five favorites, for example, or each put the names in order from top to bottom and see if any of the names can be eliminated. Spend a day concentrating on one particular name, and see how it feels to you: do you find yourself trying to find reasons not to use it, or do you find yourself feeling very reluctant to cross it off the list, or just what? Go down the list as if you’re going to cross each one off in turn, and note which ones you don’t really mind crossing off, and which ones give you heart-pangs. Find some pictures of babies online, and try the names on them like little outfits. I think of every name in the world as having at least one issue, so it may also help to go down the list and see which issues bother you more, and which ones bother you less.

I remember when Paul and I were naming Henry, that was when we had our longest list of “These are all good but none are the obvious leader” names. We narrowed it down to seven, and I spent a lot of times playing games with the names. I put the list on the wall next to my desk, so my eyes could drift to it. After awhile, some names just floated to the top and some just sank to the bottom: I’d notice that every time we discussed them, there were a few that we really did like, but that those few NEVER came out ahead of the others. Eventually we got the list down to two names, then added one more, then finally had our winner—but I think we would have been happy with either of the other two finalists, too.

There’s also some chance your husband would come around to some of the favorites he eliminated before, which could make the decision clearer.

 

 

Name update!

Carys’ little brother showed up on May 21.  After trying several times to make lists and discuss what we wanted, nothing persented as “the one” and we basically stopped talking about it until the very end.  We did know all along what it would be, but couldn’t commit.  Every time I brought it up, my husband would suggest alternatives like Helveticus (super helpful).

We settled on Alexander (Alec) Kn0wle$.  It’s a compromise to have the formal name, but call him Alec instead of Alex.  It turns out that Alexander is a family name – my great great and great great great grandfathers were Alexander.  They also happened to be Scottish, which helps tie in our nn choice.  I love it when these things work out without even trying (we found out after naming Carys that DH’s family has Welsh ancestry).

Another bonus, I haven’t had to spell it for anyone yet – a nice change from Carys.

Baby Boy or Girl C@ldwell

Hi Swistle,

I have been a long time blog reader and am thrilled that I am finally pregnant (after two years of infertility!) and can pick your brain. Our last name is C@ldwell and I am due next spring. My husband and I have decided not the find out the gender of our little one. It is so easy for me to pick out girl names, I love unisex names with short feminine middle names. My husband and I have completely agreed on two girl names: Elliott Maeve and Sawyer Brynn. We have loved these two names for a long time and could realistically use Elliott for our first daughter and Sawyer for our second.

We are in desperate need of help when it comes to boy names. My issue is I have this tendency to want to use masculine names for girls, and as a result most “boy” names are ones I would want to use for daughters. A great example of this is Jasper. My husband first mentioned the name and he absolutely loves it. I immediately thought it would be amazing for a little girl, which my husband is NOT on board with. After letting it sink in for a few months, I really have come around to the name Jasper for a boy, but for some reason, I can’t see it being the name of our little boy (does that make sense?).

The other top contender right now is Graham. I like the name quite a bit, but worry it is not strong enough of a name next to his future sisters’ names? Another big concern is the worry that a child who is Graham C. will always be called graham cracker. My husband doesn’t like Grant or other similar sounding names.

A few other names that made our lists are: Lincoln, Hudson, Desmond, Finn, Oliver. Again, all of these are great names but I have a hard time thinking of them as the name of my child. Our girl names feel so natural and I just wish we could find a boy name that felt just as right. I should also mention my husband is named Miles, which I love absolutely love, but we don’t want to name the baby after him. My two brother-in-laws are named Kaleb and Dylan which I like quite a bit as well. We would love any input of suggestions you have for our little one!! Thanks Swistle!

Meghan

 

I have been mulling this over, and I’m not sure what to advise. Awhile back we answered a similar question about siblings for a girl named Micah: What to Name the Siblings of a Child with a Gender-Neutral Name or with a Name Traditionally Given to the Opposite Sex. In that post, I had to draw a bunch of pictures to explain what I meant, but the gist of it is what you seem to be getting at as well: if you have girls named Sawyer and Elliot, should the boys have names that are more boyish than their sisters’ names?

In 2013, the name Sawyer was used for 683 new baby girls and 3,142 new baby boys. That same year, the name Elliott…well, that’s harder to figure out. Counting spellings used for more than 25 babies:

Eliot: 27 F, 194 M
Eliott: – F, 69 M
Elliette: 115 F, – M
Elliot: 308 F, 1486 M
Elliott: 280 F, 1465 M
Elliotte: 47 F, – M

That’s 777 girls and 3,214 boys—very similar to the numbers for the name Sawyer. Both names are currently unisex but used more often for boys.

I think that no matter what names you use for boys, there is going to be some occasional paperwork confusion as to whether children named Sawyer and Elliott are boys or girls. At first I thought my advice would be to reduce this effect by choosing very decisively boyish names for any boys—but I found I couldn’t muster or sustain enthusiasm for that plan. I think it’s that I can’t think of ANY names you could give to boys that would cause the names Sawyer and Elliot to read Obviously Girl on paper. Even if you named the children Sawyer, Elliott, Benjamin, and David, there will still be the occasional confusion about the names Sawyer and Elliott, and it seems like you’re aware of that and it’s not going to bother you. And the feminine middle names will help with paperwork confusion too.

I guess I would suggest staying away from names that were unisex but used mostly for girls. For example, I wouldn’t recommend naming boys Emerson and Harper in this sibling group, because it doubles the confusion factor. But Graham seems good—great, even. It’s a name used almost exclusively for boys, and I don’t think it seems insufficiently strong with sisters Sawyer and Elliott. My guess is that a child named Graham will occasionally hear the graham cracker joke regardless of the surname; I would probably avoid using it with a Cr_____ or C______er surname, but just C doesn’t make me think of cracker.

Jasper seems like another great choice. I do know what you mean, though, about really liking a name but feeling like it’s not Your Baby. I used that as a test, in fact, to narrow down my own lists: I’d imagine a baby in my arms, and then I’d try to picture the baby having each name in turn. Some of them clicked into place: YES, that’s MY baby. Others failed: great name, but not My Baby. Sometimes the test results change with time: it might happen that by spring, the name Jasper WILL seem like Your Baby. Or it may be that it’s the right name but for a second boy. Or it may continue to be “Great name, but not My Baby,” and so it’ll be the kind of name you try to talk your friends into using.

This is a shot in the dark, but I wonder if it might apply. With my first pregnancy, Paul and I were both certain the baby was a girl: it isn’t that we thought it over and made our guess, it’s that we were assuming it without even realizing we were assuming it. Finding out at an ultrasound that we were in fact expecting a boy was a significant shock. We went home and spent the rest of the day in near-silence, just getting used to the intense surprise of it: the surprise of the baby being a boy, but also the surprise of realizing we’d been assuming the baby was a girl. I’ve wondered since then if that’s why we had strong girl-name candidates but a harder time coming up with boy names: when I pictured the baby in my arms, I think I was always picturing a girl. Subsequent boys were easier to name, I think because it was easier to picture the baby as a boy. Anyway, this might not apply to you at all, but if it DOES feel like it might be the case, it could be reassuring: it might not be that you haven’t found the right name yet, it might just be that it’s hard to use the same Rightness Detectors that you’re using for girl names.

Even without a situation of that sort, many parents have an easier time with names of one sex than with names of the other sex. It could be that boy names will never click into place for you as naturally as girl names do: again, not because you haven’t found the right one yet, but because for whatever reason they just won’t click in like that for you during the naming process, and/or because you never will feel as enthusiastic about boy names.

Or maybe it IS that you haven’t found the right name yet! If so, there is still lots of time. I suggest the game I play with The Baby Name Wizard book: look up a name you like (Miles, Graham, Jasper, Sawyer, Elliot, etc.), and then pick your favorite name of the suggested brother names. You don’t have to love the name: just pick the one you like BEST of those options, and look up THAT name. And so on: keep traveling until you think, “No, these are not my style at all; I must have taken a wrong turn somewhere,” or until you loop back around to your original name; then go back and try a different choice. I found that this helped me narrow things down a little: I found I kept cycling among the same dozen or so names, and all of them fell into the same few categories, so I felt like I started getting a better grasp on what my style was. I also added a few names to the list, because I kept seeing them again and again and they grew on me.

With names such as Miles and Graham and Jasper, I think of names such as:

Edmund
Everett (not with a sister Elliott)
Felix
Franklin
Frederick
George
Gideon
Harrison
Ian
Louis
Malcolm
Sebastian
Simon
Theodore
Wesley

 

 

 

Name update!

Soon after I contacted you, we learned the exciting news that we were having twins! We didn’t find out their genders so we went into the hospital with names for every possible combination. We ended up having two beautiful boys and named them Jasper Aaron and Lincoln Michael.

Thank you SO much for your help :)

Baby Naming Issue: What if You Love Classic Names with Traditional Spellings…and Also a Modern Name with an Alternate Spelling?

Hello Swistle!

I am pregnant, due in January with a little girl. We are over the moon! We had a boy name all set in stone, and are thrown for a bit of a loop!

Here’s the issue.

I’ve always been a huge fan of easy to pronounce, classic (but a bit on the trendy side) names. I loathe creative spellings and always have.

So naturally, I’ve completely fallen in love with a unique name of which I want to stray away from the classic spelling. Help!

The name is Everleigh. I heard it first about 5 years ago when celebrity Cam Gigandet named his daughter Everleigh Rae. I was hooked! I thought it sounded whimsical and beautiful– a name you’d see in a fantasy movie. I didn’t even care that a celebrity had used it, or that it wasn’t a classic name. The spelling seemed normal to me, at the time. I loved how feminine it looked.

Then, about a year ago, another celebrity, Channing Tatum, named his daughter Everly. I started to wonder about the spelling. In searching, I found that Everly (spelled this way) was originally a boy’s name, and that this is the way it should be spelled (if I’m sticking to my naming rules at all at this point).

I can’t help but love Everleigh, spelled this way. I’m such a stickler for a ‘proper spelling’ with a ‘proper name’ that I don’t know how this spelling/name would be perceived by others. Part of me knows I shouldn’t care, and that we should name her whatever we want, but the other side of me knows the world can be a cruel, judgmental place. Would people think this was a cheap way to spell Everly? Have people even heard of this name? Is there anything else you can suggest? Needing some guidance!

If it helps at all, other names I love:
Penelope
Aubrey
Primrose
Natalie
Anneliese
Clara
Lydia

Thank you so very much,
LB

 

There are two issues here, I think. The first thing I would want to figure out, before working on the spelling, is whether Everleigh is not only an outlier name for you, but also a problematic outlier. I bring this example up a lot, but it’s particularly applicable here: when I was pregnant with my first child, I saw Teri Hatcher on a talk show and she mentioned her daughter Emerson Rose. I FLIPPED for the name. It was not my usual style at all, but it seemed PERFECT. We started calling the fetus Emerson right away. And I am very glad we had a boy, because I like sibling names to coordinate, and if we’d started with a girl named Emerson, I’m not sure where we would have gone from there: none of the other names on my list go with it at all.

So if you hadn’t provided a list, that would have been my first homework assignment for you: make a list, and see if you like any of the other names (girl names and boy names) as a sibling name for Everleigh. People have different preferences for sibling name coordination, and different feelings about which names DO coordinate, so you may look at your list and think of MANY combinations you like. Or you may look at your list and realize, as I did later with the name Emerson, that using a name outside my usual style would have painted me into a very difficult corner: there’s nothing wrong with pairing Emerson with, say, Clarissa or Genevieve or Elizabeth, but I’d prefer not to. If it is also the case for you that you look at your list and you don’t like any of the names with Everleigh (and this may very well NOT be the case), then I would suggest using it as a middle name and spelling it however you like best.

If on the other hand you look at your list and you think a lot of the names go well with Everleigh, then we can turn our attention to the second issue, which is the spelling. I too prefer to use traditional spellings. However, there are non-traditional spellings and there are NON-TRADITIONAL SPELLINGS. For example, I think you and I would agree that we didn’t want to spell Penelope “Pynnellapy.” But if you’re like me, you’re on board with Katherine/Catherine/Kathryn and Madeline/Madelyn: you might personally prefer (even strongly prefer) one spelling over another, but none of them feel like violations or make you cringe the way Jaxxon or Emmaleigh might.

With modern names such as Everleigh/Everly, I’m not sure I’d say there IS a traditional spelling. I found a commenter online claiming that the name was old and traditionally male, but I’m not having any luck verifying that claim: as far as I can tell, it’s a surname name that came into usage only recently. Historical/origin information for the the name seems to be based on its use as a surname, not as a first name. Very likely in the long history of humankind there HAVE been people with it as a first name, but it’s never been in common enough usage to have established a standard spelling. As a surname, the traditional spelling would be Everly. As a first name, we will have to wait and let time sort it out: maybe one spelling will emerge as the standard; maybe several spellings will all be considered standard; or maybe the name will be used only briefly and a standard will never be established. In 2013, the spelling Everly was used for 804 new baby girls, and the spelling Everleigh was used for 295 new baby girls. Another 119 were named Everlee, and another 71 were named Everley.

As to your concern that people won’t have heard of the name, I do think you’ll encounter some of that, since the usage of the name is relatively new and because not everyone loves baby names and follows them intently, but I think most people the age of your peers and your daughter’s peers will have encountered it—or will encounter it soon. Look at its progress on the Social Security site:

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

The online data starts in 1880. Neither Everly nor Everleigh were in the Top 1000 at all from 1880 until 2012/2013—but look how fast they’re jumping up now that they’re here: Everly was #907 the first year, and already #383 the year after that. Perhaps it will stay around that level, or perhaps in next year’s data we’ll see another huge leap.

It’s not uncommon for people to THINK they like/dislike certain things about baby names, and then find out otherwise once they start the actual naming process. The most frequent, I think, is for people to think they hate common names—and then find that their whole list is made of common names. It can be an odd adjustment, but I think it’s better to make the adjustment (“Huh! I guess I don’t hate common names as much as I’d thought! Or in fact at all!”) than to give up the names you like on principle (“All my favorite names are Top 20, but I HATE Top 20, so I must NOT like those names after all and will choose something else instead”). If you love classic names with classic spellings, but you also love Everleigh, it could be that you like classic names with traditional spellings AND modern names with alternate spellings. And how nice if you do: it gives you a much broader field for browsing. And there is room to use both styles: classic/traditional first names with modern/alternate middle names, or the other way around. Lydia Everleigh, for example, or Everleigh Sophia.

 

 

Name update!

Hello Swistle! Just wanted to thank you and your readers for all the comments and encouragement to use the name and spelling of a modern name I love. Everleigh Anne was born January 8, and we are so in love with her, and her name. Our families are really happy with it, too. Thanks again!

EVERLEIGH_170115_0037

Twin Baby Boys P______er, Brothers to Claire

Hi Swistle! I’m a longtime reader and obsessed over your blog when I was pregnant with my first. I have a 2 year old named Claire and just found out we’re having twin boys!! We’re so excited but I knew this would be the hardest name challenge for me – two girl names would’ve been no problem for me, but boys name I have such a harder time with! It doesn’t help that I find something wrong with and second guess myself on every name! I still question the name Claire, wondering if we should’ve gone with something more frilly, longer, flowery etc, especially now that we probably wont’ have another girl. If either of the twins was a girl I would’ve gone with Genevieve Ann. Sadly am mourning the loss of that name! Anyways……on to boys names. These are our current contenders:

Andrew
Collin
Aaron
Marshall – family name
Hugh
Jude
Lawrence
Harrison
Christopher
Maxwell
Oliver
Jake
Everett (possible nickname Rhett)
Walt
Edward
Wesley

Our last name begins with P and is 2 syllables, ends with -er. Wanting at least one of the names to be at least 2 syllables.

The coming up with two names at once adds an additional challenge for me! I can’t seem to separate them in my mind, but constantly say the pair I’m trying out together. My other problem is that I’ll like something for a couple of weeks, then be “over it” so it’s hard to imagine a name I’ll love forever! Does anyone else have this problem or am I the only one? ;)

I knew Claire was in the top 50 when we named her but since she was born I’ve learned of what seems like a million baby Claires. Being a Sarah of the 80s, I feel like I did the same thing to her! So, am wanting to avoid the super common – strangely, I know no Christophers, and only one each of Andrew and Jake, even though they are high on the popularity charts.

 

First I would like to give you some comfort about the popularity of the name Claire. You mention she’s two, so I will look at the 2012 statistics. In 2012, according to the Social Security Administration, the name Claire was given to .26% of baby girls. I will guess at your ’80s birth year and pick 1985: in 1985, the name Sarah/Sara was given to 1.92% of baby girls. So there were more than SEVEN TIMES as many girls named Sarah/Sara in your age group as there are girls named Claire in your daughter’s age group. For every ONE girl named Claire now, there were SEVEN girls named Sarah/Sara then. It’s the same ratio if you were born in 1989; if you were born in 1980, it’s EIGHT times as many instead of seven.

I know there will be others who will report feeling that same “like it, but then I’m over it” feeling about names. I had many name crushes, and it was alarming later to see how those crushes had faded; I too worried this meant I might not love a chosen name long-term. So far, though, I’ve found I’m only MORE committed to the names in the long term: regrets gradually fade as it becomes more and more impossible to picture having chosen a different name. A regret such as “I wish we hadn’t chosen such a common name” changes over time to something more like “I wish everyone ELSE hadn’t chosen it,” if you see what I mean. That is, I feel more and more as if we made the right choice, and I am only sorry it was the right choice for so many other people as well; I don’t wish to have made a different choice ourselves.

Because I enjoy a little twinniness with twin names, and because your daughter’s name starts with C, and because twins are referred to during the pregnancy as Baby A and Baby B, I would be a little tempted to go with an ABC pattern. You don’t have any B names on your list, but my mom and I were just talking this morning about how much we like the name Benjamin, so I’ll use that as a sample name:

Claire, Benjamin, and Andrew
Claire, Benjamin, and Aaron

I do think it can be a helpful exercise to pretend you’re not having twins. Pretend you are pregnant with only one boy right now, and pick your favorite name from the list to join his sister Claire. Then pretend it’s two years later and you are pregnant again, another boy to join siblings Claire and ______: which name is your choice this time? I do always go back to trying the two names together as a twin set, but thinking of them as two singleton births helped me avoid some of that overwhelmed feeling that comes with choosing a pair of names.

Do matching initials appeal to you? You could do Claire, Collin, and Christopher: 1, 2, and 3 syllables.

Collin and Oliver make me think of Calvin. Claire, Calvin, and…hm. Collin seems too similar, Christopher too different, and with two C names I’d want a third in this case. (Normally I say the pattern isn’t set with only two, but I feel differently about it when twins are involved.) Maybe Claire, Calvin, and Caleb. Well, but two Cal and one Cla seems too similar again. Maybe Claire, Calvin, and Charles.

Or maybe matching initials just for the twins: Andrew and Aaron, Harris and Hugh, Jude and Jacob.

I think it’s fun to make twin-name pairs from a list. I am going to play with your list a little, pairing up my own favorites, and perhaps the commenters would like to do the same.

Oliver and Wesley (matching number of letters)
Oliver and Everett (matching “ver”—but is that too much “er” with the surname?)
Everett and Harrison (both have a doubled letter)
Edward and Andrew (matching number of letters/syllables, both contain A, D, E, R, W)

I also like Hugh and Walt (matching number of letters/syllables), but neither of those has two or more syllables.

I kept wanting to use Marshall (I love family names), but felt a little reluctant to give one twin a family name and not the other. Maybe something like Marshall [Non-Family Middle] and Collin [Dad’s Name] would work.

Everett makes me think of Elliot, which I like in a very similar way. I like Oliver and Elliot together.

 

 

 

Name update!

Hi Swistle :)  Well my babies turn 1 this week so I guess it’s time to update you on our names!  Ha!  I had decided on Oliver as one of the names but for the life of me couldn’t decide on the other!  After a few days in the NICU (yes poor baby B was nameless for a while!), we decided on Andrew Paul for our darling baby B.  We had requested a Catholic priest to bless the babies at the NICU, but had no idea when he would come by our room.  About 5 minutes after deciding the name, I hear a knock at our hospital door, and it’s the priest who says “Hi, I’m here to bless your babies. What are their names”?  And he proceeds to bless them, using the names finally decided on!  It was truly a sign from God that these were the “right” names :)  Here’s a picture of our precious John Oliver (goes by Oliver) and Andrew Paul.  Thank you so much of your input!!

IMG_4935

Middle Name Challenge: Zoey ________ Hildebrand

Hello!!

We need middle name help! Our baby girl is due this Friday (November 7th), and a friend just told me about your site last night, so I figured I’d write in and see if we can get some middle name suggestions.

Her first name is Zoey, and our last name is Hildebrand. I saw a recent post on your site about the name Zoey where you said it’s getting popular and you suggested a bunch of Zoey alternatives, but we are set on that as a first name. Our problem is that there is just nothing that stands out as a middle name! We have spent many hours browsing name websites (including the Social Security name database), and after awhile they all start to blend into mush!

So here’s the relevant information:

Big sister is Phoebe Kate
Big brother is Wyatt David (David is a meaningful family name)
Zoey’s middle name can’t start with H (because of our last name) or R (because for some reason R names blend too much with the vowels in Zoey when I say both names fast)
We want to keep her middle name to one or two syllables (because it could easily become a mouthful with our last name)
If the name has two syllables, we like the sound of the accent on the second syllable, but we are not necessarily locked into that pattern
The middle name should probably not end with an “ee” sound, because that’s the sound that Zoey ends with
We are open to common, uncommon, popular, less popular, or whatever

Alright, I think that’s it.

Thanks!

 

This may be too late to be of any help, but the letter stood out to me when I was looking through the possibilities this morning.

One way to narrow things down is to look for a name that fits the same rhythm as your first daughter’s name. Phoebe Kate and Zoey ____ would mean looking for a one-syllable middle name. Some possibilities:

Zoey Belle Hildebrand
Zoey Faith Hildebrand
Zoey Fay Hildebrand
Zoey Grace Hildebrand
Zoey Grey Hildebrand
Zoey Jade Hildebrand
Zoey Jane Hildebrand
Zoey Jean Hildebrand
Zoey Laine Hildebrand
Zoey Mae Hildebrand
Zoey Paige Hildebrand
Zoey Quinn Hildebrand

I like Claire as a one-syllable middle, but with first names ending in an -ee sound I always hear eclair: Zo Eclair.

I also like Zoey Louise a lot, and that would give you the 2-syllable accent-on-2nd-syllable sound. And I love Zoey Noelle. The middle name Marie was very common in my generation but I feel like I hear it far, far less often on current babies; Zoey Marie is pretty. Or Zoe Elise.

If nothing stands out, here are a few strategies to try:

1. Look for a name with significance to you: a family name, for example. If you don’t really care if it’s Zoey Marie or Zoey Elise or Zoey Mae, but Marie is your mother’s middle name, you can let that tip you toward the Marie choice. Would your own middle name work? Or are there any family surnames that could be preserved?

(I can see how this might be a little worrisome if Phoebe’s middle name doesn’t have any particular significance, and then Wyatt’s and Zoey’s both do. If Phoebe is the firstborn, I would spin it that “being firstborn” is her special thing. If not, I still wouldn’t worry very much: four of my kids have honor middle names and one doesn’t, and so far none of them care. We say to the one without the honor middle name: “And your middle name was because we loved it so much.”)

2. If one or both of your other children are old enough, ask for their input. It can make for a sweet story to say that an older sibling helped choose a younger sibling’s name.

3. Are there any names you would have liked to use as a first name, but couldn’t because of issues such as a friend using the name, or not liking the initials, or not liking it with the sibling names, or not liking it with your surname? This could be a good way to salvage one of those names.

 

And I think at some point it’s fine to say “Let’s just PICK something.” For my fifth child, we had three middle names that all sounded equally good to us and all had similar levels of significance. Finally we just PICKED one. I haven’t regretted the one we chose, and I don’t think I would have regretted choosing one of the others: the nice thing about nothing standing out is that it probably means all the choices are equally good and you’d be equally happy with any of them.

 

 

Name update!

Hi Swistle!

Baby Zoey was born this week, and we named her Zoey June. Thanks for your suggestions, and to everyone else who added their thoughts!

Jenn

Baby Girl M0ntre@l, Sister to Kyle and Joshua

Hi Swistle! It is finally my turn to email you, as I have read your blog for a long and time love love love your advice. We are expecting a baby girl in March of 2015 and although we’ve had a list since before we started even THINKING about kids (literally, it was something we discussed on our first date, what a topic, huh—“What are you planning on naming your future children?!”) we now cannot make a decision. I have two step sons, Kyle and Joshua (Josh.) This is my first, and we’re super excited to be adding a girl. I’m named after my grandmother, Mary Louise, and carry her middle name. I’d like to continue this trend. My mother’s middle is Lynne. Here’s where our dilemma comes in…

We love the name Eleanor. But, does Eleanor Lynne sounds too lin-lin to you? Some people hear Ella-nor and others hear El-lynn-or. Do you think it is too repetitive to use Lynne as a middle? We’ve also considered Amelia, Hannah (He loves, I’m ehh) Harriet and Charlotte. I don’t love them as much as I love Eleanor, but I could be swayed. We’re also super open to other suggestions!

I pinky swear that if you help name our baby, I will absolutely update you and the readers as soon as she arrives!!

Our last name is M0ntre@l, pronounced exactly like the city. For the record, we’re Dave and Rachel. Thank you in advance!

 

I do notice the repeating “lin” sound, but I’m not sure how quickly I would have noticed it if you hadn’t mentioned it, and it doesn’t bother me. There was recently a news story about a little girl named Brooklyn Lynn, and that is a much more serious repeating-“lin” issue—and yet after a moment of noticing it, I found I shrugged and thought “Who cares?” If their favorite name is Brooklyn and they want to honor a Lynn or even they just LIKE the name Lynn, is there any reason in the whole wide world they shouldn’t go right ahead and do that? No, there really isn’t.

Coming from that line of thought to your Eleanor Lynne issue helped me to clarify things. It doesn’t seem like a problem, and in fact I suspect some people would find the repeating “lin” sound increased the appeal of the name—and as you’ve noted, some people wouldn’t hear a repeating “lin” sound at all. I also see the potential for cute around-the-house nicknames such as Linnie-Lynne.

 

 

Name update!

Hi Swistle! I’m Rachel. I wrote to you last year after learning we were having a girl. Eleanor Jane arrived on April 7th (TWO WEEKS LATE!) and just reminded me that I had yet to share her picture and name with you even though I promised.

Thank you and your readers for your suggestions!! We love her name and it fits her perfectly.

I hope you’re ready to help name #4 someday!

IMG_20150613