Author Archives: Swistle

Baby Boy McIntire

Greetings, Swistle:

My husband and I are expecting a boy towards the end of February. We plan to have only one child.

We briefly discussed names before we found out the gender at 12 weeks but we both had initially agreed on Vesper or Vespera for a girl. Middle name for a boy or girl would be an honor name.

Since then, we have been lost. I have become obsessed with finding the “perfect” name and he finds a name he likes, attaches to it for a few weeks, and then gets bored with it. I am now 34 weeks pregnant and he wants to just choose a name when the little guy is here but I find the idea daunting and think it’s important to at least have a short list of names.

My name is a misspelled variation of a trendy 80s girl name. His name is a nickname variation of a classic boys name. Both begin with A and last name is McIntire. Neither of us want anything remotely common, but I prefer something still established and “usable” with a nickname variation that’s not too weird for a resume and he ventures into names that I consider not usable at all. We are in the United States and my ancestry is mostly Scottish, Irish and English while his is mostly Scottish, German and Spanish.

Current front-runners are Lucian/Lucan or Finan/Finnan. Lucian is derived from Latin, Lucan and Finan are Gaelic. My hesitation is whether they are too weird and whether the LO will be swimming in a sea of Finn’s in a few years. Lucas is classic but it seems Finn is trendy.

Other names that have not been completely vetoed are Killian/Cillian and Cassian. His favorites are Aquila, Quill, Achilles and Acacius. I also like Caius, Eamon, Cormac, Leander and Malakai but most don’t really work with our last name. My parents have resorted to calling the baby Jack and I love the name but it is way too popular for my taste and also doesn’t work with our last name.

Please help us. I will be happy to send an update if this child ever has a name.

Kind regards,

 

I was very amused by the subject line of your email (“An Impossible Couple Seeks a Boy Name”) and hope this post will not be far too late to help.

There is a certain joy in choosing a baby name without taking sibling names into account, and I am feeling that joy here. I think you have a lot of good/cool choices to work with.

I think the most difficult thing about naming the first child is really CONCEPTUALIZING the baby as a person. This is one use for The Starbucks Test, which is where you take one of the names you’re considering for the baby, and say it to the barista as if it were your own. It helps to bridge that gap between names that are cool and fun to think about, and names that work for a real actual person living life and ordering coffee. I think this is the sort of thing that may assist a baby-namer of your husband’s variety: it’s one thing to suggest Achilles/Acacius when you’ve grown up as, say, a Matt, and quite another to say it with your own voice to someone who has to write it on a cup.

Which is not to imply I think Achilles/Acacius should be off the table. No: name variety is lovely and I am fresh from seeing many, many classroom valentines-exchange lists containing many surprising names. It’s more that I think it’s a good idea to go into such a choice with a firm grasp of the context in which the name will be used once it is off of the ideas list and onto the actual person. “Can you change Achilles’s diaper?” and “Acacius, how many times do I have to tell you to put the toilet seat down??” and “Dinnertime, Aquila!”

Here’s another exercise for getting names to click out of the theoretical: Go to a public place where there is a wide variety of people of a wide variety of ages/types (a mall is perfect, if you have one near you). Bring your name lists with you, and sit where you can see lots of people (near the food court is my favorite). One at a time, take a name from the list, and apply it to a bunch of people of various ages. “That baby’s name is Killian. That toddler’s name is Killian. His father’s name is Killian. That elderly man’s name is Killian. The custodian’s name is Killian. The clerk at the crepes stand is also named Killian.” Does the name WORK? Do you think, “Yeah, that fits a nice variety of people!”

I know you’ve heard me say this a million times before, but I strongly encourage shifting the goal away from perfection if at all possible. Especially when you are naming just one child, I think there can be a feeling almost as if there is One Best Name, and that this is your one chance to use it, and that you must find it. But there are lots and lots of names that would work well for any given baby, and the parents’ only real responsibility is to choose something the baby can later write on their homework and say to the barista and give to the receptionist when they arrive for their appointment. A name can be a delightful, meaningful, beautiful thing, but it is at its heart a PRACTICAL thing, and so as long as you are making a good faith effort to give him a good, useful name, everything is going to be fine.

Lucian, Lucan, Finan, Finnan, Finian—those all seem to me to fit the bill. It’s hard to predict which names will rise to the point where their popularity may cause you regret; at some point I think the only thing to do is pick your favorite and hope for the best.

If you wanted to add more contenders to the list (and perhaps at this late point that would be unhelpful), I notice a LOT of K/Q/hard-C and L sounds in your lists. I might skim one more time through the boy-name section of a baby name book, saying each one aloud briskly and scanning for those sounds. Aidric, Alec, Arlo, Brannock, Brecken, Broderick, Calder, Callan, Calvin, Clark, Declan, Kellan, Lachlan, etc.

Baby Names with Bird Nicknames

Hey Swistle, fun question for you. Sort of by happenstance, both our girls have historic names with bird nicknames. Katherine called Wren and Hilaria called Lark. (Okay, honestly it’s 30% full names, 20% Wren and Lark, 50% Doodle and Roo, from a lullaby I sing them.)

We are not currently expecting, but it struck me as a fun sort of lying-awake exercise: what other names have avian and/or natural nicknames?
I’d get particularly excited about something that led to the nickname Dove. Dora Verity? Paloma, I suppose. David!

B.

 

That IS a fun question, and a perfect one for a day when it feels as if there is some faint hope that spring may one day return to our midst.

I am fond of the names where the natural nickname Bertie can instead be Birdy/Birdie. I think it’s a lovely way to handle an honor name that may not quite have come back into style just yet (Roberta, Alberta). I think it also works as a nickname for Bernadette.

I have heard that that name Robin started as a nickname for the name Robert, and I haven’t been so charmed since I heard of Hodge as a nickname for Roger.

As I sit in the waiting room of a doctor’s office, I hear a receptionist named Avis saying her name again and again as she answers the phone, and I think about how uncommon her name is, especially considering how close it is to the much more common name Ava.

More bird (or similar nature-y) names/nicknames?

Baby Naming Issue: Are the Initials “DAB” an Issue?

Dear Swistle,

I try to pay attention to initials, and we are considering a name that would spell DAB. I don’t mind the fact that the word is a fairly innocuous verb, but I am more concerned that a Google search of the word brings up a page filled with references to marijuana, and the dance/picture pose fad. I am not highly into pop culture, so I am seeking input to see if this is something that will be commonly picked up on. Will the dance/picture fad be old enough by the time the baby is old enough for conversation that it won’t be something that comes to mind amongst their peers? Perhaps your readers could share opinions on this?

Thank you

 

My vote is that this is a non-issue. My own preference is to avoid initials spelling things when possible, and I’m familiar with the annoying dab pose (I had to look up the marijuana term), and this still feels like a big shrug to me if you love the name.

When I’m trying to figure out if a naming issue is a problem (like when initials spell something, or when the first name blends into the surname), what I do is think about what bad thing could happen as a result of the initials/blending; I can’t picture anything very bad happening here. What if in elementary school your child’s peers find out their initials, AND people are still dabbing, AND those little kids know more than I do about marijuana vocabulary? WHAT THEN?? Nothing important, is what. And that’s IF they find out the initials! And if there WAS a “What’s your middle name?”/”What are your initials?” trend (there was at my school, but to be fair I was the one who started it and I have always been more than normally interested in names), there would definitely be other kids with slightly odd/funny initials to take some of the heat.

I should have asked my kids before they went to school, but I’m imagining what they’d do if they found out a friend had the initials DAB. Elizabeth’s group of friends (9th graders) does some mild affectionate recurring name-related teasing, and here are some of the things she’s mentioned:

1) Occasionally calling someone a funny mispronunciation of their name, especially if it happened in a group experience (e.g., the substitute teacher mispronounced someone’s name, or someone once mistyped the name in a group chat)

2) Occasionally pretending a nickname is short for a different name/word (e.g., pretending to think Addy is short for Advertisement)

3) Occasionally using a nickname the person doesn’t use (e.g., calling an Elizabeth “Betsy” or “Liz” when she only goes by Elizabeth)

4) Occasionally calling someone by their full name, especially if the middle name is considered by the group to be embarrassing (generally the vintage-revival or honor names we love here, so that I am constantly saying “But that’s a LOVELY name!” while Elizabeth rolls her eyes).

 

My guess is that there would be the occasional “Calling the person ‘DAB’ and then doing that dumb pose,” and that that’s all there would be to it—and that even THAT is somewhat unlikely to happen. (Elizabeth is more than typically interested in names, and the running name-related jokes are not happening in any of my other kids’ friend groups.)

Twitter poll: Are the initials DAB enough of an issue that they shouldn’t use the name? [poll closed; see results below]

Baby Naming Issue: Are Sophie and Josie Too Close? How About Sophie and Zoey?

Dear Swistle, Is Josie too close of a sibling name for Sophie? What about Zoey with Sophie? Too similar? I like names that end in the long-e sound (ie, y) but don’t want to end up with names that sound too similar.

 

They’re too close for my own personal taste—but it’s easy to think of tons of families I know who have used two names that are closer than I’d like, and it isn’t the sort of thing that is causing shock-waves throughout our community.

It’s not just matching endings but also a matching dominant vowel sound: both pairings of names include a matching OH-EE. Calling one of those names from a distance, I think you’re going to get both kids answering.

Sophie and Zoey are even closer than Sophie and Josie, because S and Z are very similar: S is the unvoiced version of the sound, and Z is the voiced one. So then it’s more like two and a half points of overlap: half a point for the first sound, then the OH, and then the EE—and with the same number of syllables in the same order. Well, and if you’re saying Josie JO-see instead of JO-zee, then that matches an S sound with Sophie, though in a different part of the name.

But lots of people LOVE similar sibling names and do it on purpose! There are people who have an Ella and an Emma! A Noah and an Owen! A James and a Jane! An Emily and an Amelia! So if you love the names, and you love them together, and you won’t be bothered by other people’s occasional confusion, then I don’t think there’s anything wrong with going ahead with it. They ARE different names, they just SOUND similar.

Twitter poll [closed; see results below]:

Twitter poll [closed; see results below]:

Baby Girl Carrot-with-an-M, Sister to Avila and Rose

We are expecting a third daughter at the end of February (coming up fast!), and since you were so helpful in helping us name our last child, I thought I’d ask for help again.

Our daughters are Avila Marie (sometimes called Avi like Abby) and Rose Therese Eowyn (usually called Rosie). Our last name is Carrot-with-an-M, and we’d like to have more children.

My husband and I have very different naming styles: his name ideas are often outside the top 1000, while mine tend to be names in the top 100 or just outside of it. (We do have one unifying thread, which is that we pick names of a saint that we really like. But since 95% of people we meet don’t know who St. Teresa of Avila is, this unifying factor is often not noticeable.) You can probably guess that Avila was my husband’s favorite name (my choice would have been Claire.) And Rose was my favorite name.

Well, here we are with unnamed baby three, and we have narrowed the field down to three names:

My favorite names are
Tessa (nn Tess)
Genevieve (nn Evie, which is really close to Avi).

His favorite name is
Zelie (we’d pronounce it like “jelly.”) From what I understand, it’s a currently popular French name derived from the longer name Azelie, (which means Azalea…a nice floral tie-in with the name Rose.)

At various moments we have said “yes, let’s do it!” to each of these three names, but then we keep coming back to the table again. I want to pick a name and be done!

Here’s my dilemma. My husband has been going through a difficult time the last few months, and it has made it hard for him to be excited about this pregnancy (obviously, it will be easier when she’s here.) This makes me want to say yes to Zelie–just because it means to have him in love with her name. (Also he’s talked about the combo of Zelie Louise, which is fun and zippy to say.)

On the other hand, I find myself hesitating just when I want to say yes to the name Zelie. My hesitation stems from how long it took me to love the name Avila, even after she was born (though I do love it now.) I still have a momentary flicker of resignation in the doctor’s office/new neighbor/party event where the person I’m talking to hesitates and says, “what is her name again?” and then proceeds to call her something else unintentionally. Then again, it’s mostly adults on the periphery of our lives who have this problem. Other kids always seem to easily grasp her name.

If we did go with the name Zelie Louise, here’s what I’d love to know:

1. Would you guess that you said the name Zelie like “jelly”?

2. Does it seem too much of a nickname-y name to you? We could name her the full name Azelie, if that was better, and call her Zelie. Or is that just giving her two unpronounceable names to grapple with?

3. The name we’d probably use if we have a boy in the future is Blaise. Does Avila, Rose, Zelie, and Blaise make the name Rose stand out as an outlier?

Thanks for your help!

 

This seems like a great question for a group answer, since there are so many parts of it that will be completely subjective. I wish the polls still worked. I will put a poll on Twitter, but that’s unsatisfying because of how many people aren’t on Twitter. But it is better than nothing. And in fact, it might be better than a blog poll because it’ll get some votes from people who are not baby-name hobbyists, which may give a more accurate representation of what you’d find in the public at large. Well, on to my subjective answers:

1. Would I guess that the name Zelie was pronounced to rhyme with jelly? No. With that spelling, similar to Amelia rather than to Ellie, I would first guess ZEE-lee. One could argue that it would be more accurate to say that the spelling is like Amelie, but that requires knowing that the name Zelie is French and also knowing how to pronounce Amelie; I feel like the segment of the U.S. population who would know both of those things is…small. But this is why this is a great question for a group: we may find there are tons of us who would have gone straight to Zelly. Here’s a link to the Twitter poll, for those who can use it; I will post the results here when it’s over. [Poll closed; results:]

[Of the comments on the 3-tweet series, there were 2 comments saying Zellie, 7 comments saying Zeelie, and 5 comments saying Zaylie, plus several comments expressing uncertainty between two options.]

2. Does it seem like a nickname-y name? I am going back and forth on this, and I think it’s because I’m unfamiliar with the name. A name like Ellie seems too nicknamey to me for a given name, but a name like Julie does not; it’s hard for me to figure out which one Zelie is more like. And again: SO SUBJECTIVE! The next person could say the exact opposite: that Ellie seemed like a given name, but Julie was clearly a nickname. I think if I can’t decide if it’s too nicknamey, that means for me it’s NOT too nicknamey.

3. Does this sibling group work with a possible future child named Blaise? I’d say yes, except that Rose and Blaise sound similar to me. But perhaps that is the very thing that helps tie the name group together. I do think the name Rose is going to stand out a little no matter what, just because it’s so familiar and the other names are less so.

4. You didn’t ask this, but I’m adding it: Do I think you should let your husband have his choice for the baby’s name because he’s been having a rough time lately? No. I think you should find other ways to comfort him. Get him a treat the next time you’re at the store, let him choose which TV show to watch, let him choose what you’re having for dinner. Choosing the baby’s name may improve his excitement/mood in the few weeks between now and the time the baby is born, but the name is forever.

 

If you’re looking for a compromise that lets your husband choose his favorite name but reduces the things you’ve found a little burdensome about unfamiliar names (the continual repeating/reminding/spelling/etc.), I wonder if it would work to spell it Zellie. Then you could say “Like Ellie, with a Z!” I think it would also significantly reduce mispronunciations: when I see Zellie, I immediately guess it rhymes with Ellie/jelly.

If you would like to instead look for a compromise that lets you choose one of your favorite names, I think Zelie makes a delightful middle name choice. Some combinations might need a little work (e.g., Tessa Zelie is not ideal to my ear), but adding another middle name could help with that (e.g., Tessa Claire Zelie).

You don’t mention Louise as a first-name option, but I love it and the similar name Louisa, which is apparently a saint name. Louisa Zelie? Avila, Rose, and Louisa.

Another possibility is Lucilla. Saint name, unusual, shares some sounds with Zelie, has the easy nickname Lucy.

One of my own favorite saint names is Winifred, and I love it so much with your surname, and it gives you the nicknames Winnie and Freddie. Avila, Rose, and Winifred. LOVE THIS.

I wanted very badly to suggest Josephine: it has some things in common with Genevieve, without the awkward similar-nickname Evie. But then I realized it just swaps the Avi/Evie issue for a Rosie/Josie issue.

Another option might be to name her Azalea and call her Zellie as a nickname. Here is what I like about this option:

1. It gives your husband a very unusual name, while giving you one that most people know how to pronounce.

2. It makes a link between the unusual name Avila and the more familiar flower-name Rose.

3. It gives you a nickname that isn’t too similar to Avi.

Here is what I don’t like about this option:

1. Avila and Azalea are more similar in appearance/letters than I would generally prefer for sibling names. (Though they do sound very different.)

2. For me, Zellie would not be a natural nickname for Azalea. (But I think it works fine.)

 

 

 

Name update:

It was great to read all of your thoughts and comments about the name Zelie! I think deep down I worry that when other people hear my baby’s unusual name, the initial response (even if not spoken aloud) is disapproval. So it was affirming to have so many people comment on the name, not one of whom said, “Are you nuts?! Don’t do it!”

Posting my letter also reopened the naming conversation with my husband, who really wanted to make sure that I was fully on board with whatever name we chose. I thought about ways that might help make the name Zelie Louise feel more like my choice also, and I liked the idea of giving the baby a second middle name in honor of my dad Norman. In the end, we decided to wait until the baby arrived to make a final decision.

I often find myself talking to the baby during labor, and this time I kept calling her Zelie—and that was pretty much the clincher for me. By the time she arrived I felt good about her name: Zelie Louise Nora. Thanks to all of you for your thoughts!

Baby Girl Vansanover: Is the Name Bernadette Too Catholic?

Dear Swistle,

I am pregnant with my first child, a girl, due in May. As a lifelong name enthusiast, I am astounded to find myself having such difficulty choosing a name for her. Our surname is long and Dutch and sounds similar to Vansanover. We are Americans currently living in London; we will more than likely be headed back to the US within the next several years, so we are most concerned with the popularity and perceptions of names from an American perspective.

We have narrowed our name search to three options, Bernadette, Florence and Felicity, with Bernadette being the current front-runner. I have always loved this name for its strong but charming meaning and the endless nickname possibilities (we particularly love Betty and Birdie but also like that she could choose something herself as she gets older).

The only thing holding me back from choosing Bernadette enthusiastically is that it has recently come to my attention that it is perceived as a Catholic name. Neither my husband nor I are religious. The religious connotation doesn’t bother us per se, especially since the meaning of the name is entirely secular. However, I realize her name will inform others’ perceptions of her, and I don’t really want everyone assuming she is a strictly observant Catholic without meeting her. My impression is that Brits are much more attuned to the Catholic connotation than Americans are, but it’s also possible I was oblivious to it in the US since the religious communities in my hometown were predominantly protestant. My British friends say it conjures an image of a mean old nun and that no one actually names their children Bernadette (i.e. it is only used as a nun’s religious name).

Her middle name will be Flynn, my mother’s maiden name, which seems to double down on the Catholic-ness.

How strong do you think the Catholic association with this name is in the US? Would you assume a girl named Bernadette came from a Catholic family? How much should this matter?

Thanks for you help!

Amy

 

HERE IS WHAT I THINK. I think there has been a major shift in using names formerly strongly associated with religion, and that this shift has happened within the last generation. I remember before my children were born encountering my first baby named Noah and being shocked, SHOCKED, that someone would use such a strikingly biblical name. I’d gone to Christian schools for middle school and college, and not even conservative evangelical Christians would use a name like Noah! Josiah, sure, and there were plenty of Davids and Sarahs and Matthews and Rebeccas, but not NOAH!

And now the name Noah is the number one most popular boy name in the United States, and there is no reason to assume the parents of any given Noah are religious. Also in style: Ezra, Elijah, Levi, Isaac, Asher, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Moses. Older generations may still find it a little shocking, especially if they are not baby-name hobbyists and so haven’t been keeping track of the trends—but the current kid-naming parents find these names completely mainstream/contemporary.

I used to think of the name Bernadette as Very Catholic. I’d known only two Bernadettes: a mom at the same daycare where I encountered my first Noah; and Bernadette-called-Benny in Maeve Binchy’s book Circle of Friends. I was also familiar with it as one of many Nun Names. All very very Catholic associations.

But now! Now if I encountered a baby named Bernadette, I might WONDER if the family was Catholic but, as with the name Noah, I would actually think it was more likely they were NOT religious. (Furthermore, I’d be DELIGHTED to encounter the name and its delightful nicknames.) I think it’s highly possible your friends who are appalled at this Mean Old Nun name are just in the same stage I was when I was shocked by a Noah, and that they will catch up soon. And I think in the U.S., even if people might at first wonder if the usage is for Catholic-related reasons, they will soon understand from other clues that it is not. I say it’s fabulous and I say USE IT. (But I also LOVE both your other choices, and would feel equally delighted to encounter either of those names.)

Baby Girl, Sister to Brielle and Savannah

Hello Swistle,

I need help with a name for my third daughter. My first born is Brielle and my second born is Savannah. There nicknames are Bri and Savi. We will be expecting our little angel in May. My husband likes the name Brooke and Paige.. I am torn, as I dont know if its ok to have two B names and leave the middle child with an S name. I dont want her to feel different.

I would love any suggestions you can recommend.

Thank you,
Candace Filla

 

I am not worried about one child feeling left out or different because she has an S-name and her sisters have B-names: this seems like the kind of thing we worry about during the pregnancy and then it never ends up being an issue—or it ends up being the opposite issue, and her sisters are jealous that SHE has her own initial. (This is how I would have felt: mad to have to share, not mad to be left out.)

(If it DID ever come up, you could play the Same/Different Game: “Yes, Bri and Brooke start with Br-, and you start with S-. You and Brielle and Brooke all have double letters in your names, but you all have a different number of syllables: Brooke’s name is one, Brielle’s is two, and yours is three. You and Bri both have nicknames ending in -i….” And so on. You can include your name and your husband’s name to make the game more fun, and to widen the pool of people who don’t share an initial.)

I do worry a little about how similar the names Bri and Brooke sound: starting with the same letter-blend is more matchy than starting with the same initial. And I worry a little that Brielle and Savannah are highly feminine names, while Brooke and Paige are preppy, low-frill names. And I worry a little that Brielle and Savannah both have nicknames, while Brooke does not.

Popularity is another factor: Savannah was in style alongside Brooke and Paige a couple of decades ago, when the name Brielle was rare; but while Savannah has been holding onto its Top 50 ranking, Brooke and Paige have been diving into the 200s. Meanwhile, the name Brielle is rising, hitting the Top 100 for the first time in 2018. I think Savannah and Brooke and Savannah and Paige could work well as sister name pairings because of their earlier shared popularity, but that then Brielle feels like the odd name out. But if we look for other recently-gaining-popularity choices to go with Brielle, then the name Savannah could feel like the odd name out—especially if the little dip it took in popularity in 2018 turns out to have been the beginning of a decline. The good news: this is all looking very promising for playing Same/Different, since we’re finding ways to make EVERY name seem like the different one!

Finally, would the child’s surname be Filla, and is that pronounced like the way someone who dropped their R’s might say the word “filler”? I would probably avoid noun names that can sound like little jokes: Brooke Filla sounds like a riddle for a rainstorm, Paige Filla like a riddle for a writer.

I was going to make a list of more options to consider, but we don’t have much to go on: we have two names your husband likes, plus two names the two of you agreed on for previous children. I think what I would suggest is starting over: BOTH of you make lists, and see which names you like best with your first two daughters’ names. My own inclination would be to find another name with a nickname, but that would only be a preference.

Baby Girl Sounds-Like-Edward, Sister to Parker

Hi Swistle,

We are attempting to name a baby girl due this spring. We already have one daughter named Parker, and our last name sounds like Edward. We don’t like the way vowel names flow with our last name (aka, no Ella’s!), and we tend towards names that are a little bit unique/rare (would love her to not have several classmates with the same name) but not too far out there. The middle name, if that matters, will be Alice (a family name), and the boy name would have used was Jacoby. We are thinking this is probably our last child, though we haven’t made any final decisions yet. My husband also doesn’t like names that will definitely be shortened to nicknames (such as Kathryn à Katie). Top contenders so far for baby girl’s name:

-Hadley (her cousin has a cousin on the other side named Hadley… we only see that child once a year and they’ll be 5 years apart, is that too close of a relationship?)
-Kendall (does this bring up the Kardashian family too much?)
-Kennedy (is this too pretentious?)
-Lincoln (will everyone always think she’s a boy? Is it too popular of a boy’s name now?)
-McKenna (I’m not sure about the Mc)
-Logan (perhaps my lack of comment on this name means it should be a front runner)
-Zoe (might be too popular)
-Payton (but I’m not sure I like the alliteration of Parker & Payton)
-Carson (we liked, but my close friend has a dog named Carson, so that seems pretty odd)

We are very open to other suggestions! Please help!

Many thanks,
Sara

 

With a sister named Parker, one thing I would want to take into account is the relative usage of each name. In 2018, according to the Social Security Administration, the name Parker was given to 1,754 new baby girls and 3,978 new baby boys: its current usage is unisex but used approximately twice as often for boys. I would want to find something similar for a sister, to avoid spinning the name Parker as a brother name.

A cousin who has a cousin named Hadley does not seem remotely an issue to me. I hesitate mainly because the name Hadley is used almost exclusively for girls in the United States: 2,861 new baby girls and 37 new baby boys in 2018.

Kendall does not make me think of the Kardashians, and I’ve had a previously unnoticed opportunity to test this out because my kids have a classmate named Kendall and the association didn’t occur to me. Again, my main hesitation is that the name Kendall is used much more often for girls in the United States: 1,209 new baby girls and 245 new baby boys in 2018.

Kennedy doesn’t sound pretentious to me; it feels familiar as a name at this point But its usage is almost exclusively for girls: 3,924 new baby girls and 126 new baby boys in 2018.

Lincoln goes the opposite way: its current usage in the United States is almost exclusively for boys: 163 new baby girls and 7,368 new baby boys in 2018. Also, with Parker I think of Linkin Park, but that is perhaps a reach, and a dated reach at that; I suspect most people would just think “Those names seem to go together well in a way I can’t quite put a finger on.”

McKenna is a good style match with Parker, though again we run into usage: in 2018, it was given to 1,254 new baby girls and there is no record of it being given to any new baby boys at all.

Logan is perhaps my favorite of your choices, not only because of your comment about not having a comment, but also because its usage is boy-heavy but not exclusively boy: 1,074 new baby girls and 12,352 new baby boys in 2018. I wonder, though, if that is too popular for you: as a current Top Ten boy name, the name is likely to show up in some of her classrooms.

I want to cross Zoe off your list. Not only is it used exclusively for girls in the U.S., which spins Parker as a brother name, but the spellings Zoe and Zoey combine to make it even more popular than you might think if you just checked the rankings: in 2018, there were 5,899 new baby girls named Zoey and 5,062 new baby girls named Zoe, for a total of 10,961; for comparison, there were 10,582 new baby girls named Harper (the #9 most popular girl name) and 10,376 new baby girls named Evelyn (the #10 most popular girl name).

Payton does seem very cute with Parker, and I agree that’s the kind of style choice you may or may not want. Usage-wise, Payton is currently used more often for girls in the U.S.: 1,413 new baby girls and 233 new baby boys in 2018. (The spelling Peyton adds another 2,896 baby girls and 787 baby boys.)

Carson’s usage skews way to the boys: 205 new baby girls and 5,227 new baby boys in 2018.

I can see you like unisex/surname names. My own preference would be for more unisex/surname names that are used more often for boys, but not SO MUCH MORE often for boys (like Lincoln and Carson); or even used more often for girls, but not SO MUCH MORE often for girls (like Hadley and Kennedy).

I think Avery is probably too popular for your tastes, but it’s the kind of name I mean: in 2018, it was given to 8,053 new baby girls and 2,098 new baby boys. If I encountered a sibling set named Parker and Avery, I would not make any assumptions and would be ready for two boys, two girls, or one of each in either direction.

Riley is another option—again, probably too popular, but just as an example. It’s hard to tally it up because of all the spellings, but in 2018 there were 5,976 new baby girls and 1,455 new baby boys named Riley; 72 new baby girls and 70 new baby boys named Reilly; 1,915 new baby girls and 10 new baby boys named Ryleigh; and so on. Some spellings are used more often for girls, but overall the usage is so spread out that if I encountered siblings named Parker and Riley I wouldn’t make any early guesses.

I wonder if Gracen would be a good choice. The spelling makes it relatively feminine compared to Grayson, but the alternate options Grayson/Greyson keep it sounding unisex.

Oh! What about Rowan? Used in 2018 for 1,447 new baby girls and 3,020 new baby boys (the spelling Rowen adds 186 girls and 585 boys), its usage is similar to the name Parker. Rowan Alice. Parker and Rowan. I love it.

The name Beckett has usage numbers that fly directly in the face of what I’m looking for (74 new baby girls and 1,657 new baby boys in 2018), but I suggest it anyway. Beckett Alice. Parker and Beckett. I like the snappy repeated K-sounds of the two names, which seems subtler than the alliteration of Parker and Payton.

Maybe Emerson? It might be too easy to nickname it to Emmie. But if not, the usage is pretty good: 1,935 new baby girls and 1,238 new baby boys in 2018 (the spelling Emersyn adds 1,886 girls and 24 boys).

I’m having trouble coming up with more options, which is making me feel like abandoning the whole usage goal. It’s likely more important to find names that SOUND like they have the right usage—but of course that’s going to vary depending on part of the country and personal experience. I may be completely familiar with Logan as a girl name because of happening to know two female Logans, while someone else is saying “Someone used LOGAN for a GIRL????” because in their area no one would, or because they’re not as interested in baby names as some of us so they haven’t been keeping up.  And when I hear “Parker and Kendall,” I don’t think “Oh, Parker is definitely a boy, then,” even though I know the usages—and in fact, the differing usages is one thing that makes me hesitate; “Parker and Logan,” with its matched usages, is more likely to make me think of brothers.

Well. I seem to have gotten stuck, and this post has been sitting in my drafts for almost a week without me coming up with more ideas, so let’s turn this over to others.

 

 

 

Name update:

Dear Swistle,

Thank you so much for answering our question earlier this year. After submitting but before seeing your reply, we had another conversation about names and had put Hadley, Kendall, Logan, and Lincoln in the top 4. Then, hearing my concerns about Lincoln being too boy-leaning, it was pointed out to me how popular of a name Logan is for boys right now, and we agreed to eliminate both names. (It isn’t so much that I don’t want a name that is too boyish, more so that I didn’t want her to be one of 8 Logans in her class – which you identified n your post). Having only Hadley and Kendall left, but not being particularly sold on either, we returned to reviewing random blogs and lists of baby names. We had many “near misses” with geography: we liked names like Brooklyn, Madison, Phoenix, and Raleigh but couldn’t quite get on board with any one of them for various reasons. Then the name Brighton came up on a list of geography-inspired names and we both became more excited.

Reading your response really put in perspective for me WHY I would be happier with a neutral name: not because I needed both names to be neutral, but because “Kendall and Parker” seemed to imply that Parker was probably a boy, and that made me grumpy. I also came to the realization that any P name wasn’t going to work – I liked the idea of Parker having her own initial.

You and the commenters suggested many good names – Sawyer, Sutton, and Sloane were lovely, but my husband and I both have S-names and didn’t want Parker to feel left out of the S club. Your suggestion of Avery was GREAT, we do love that name, but we have a good friend with a daughter Avery so we didn’t want to use it for that reason. We also don’t love the way vowel-starting names sound with our vowel-starting last name (so that crossed Emerson off the list, too). One reader suggested Tatum – such a good pick! Also, Parker’s cousin’s name (and they are close in age and geographic proximity). Gracen is fun, but too close to Grayson, and Parker has a boy cousin Grayson. We might be too particular with our strange rules (no S’s, no vowel’s, and perhaps we know too many people and can’t name our kids after any of them, blah blah blah).

Your suggestion of Beckett was excellent, and we nearly went with it. I think though, that having come up with Brighton on our own before reading your response and comments – and then seeing it the comments – was very validating for us. We fell in love with the name Brighton, and also how adorable it was teaching little Parker to say “baby Brighton” which sounds like “baby Britty.”

Baby Brighton was born on April 28, in the midst of this very crazy pandemic. Thank you for all of your help!