Author Archives: Swistle

Baby Girl Mifsud

A. writes:

I love reading your blog and think your feedback is really comprehensive and helpful. I hope that you can help us in our relentless search to find the perfect name and ease my indecision.

My husband and I are eagerly expecting our first child , a girl, in February. Since discovering we’re having a baby girl, we’ve been back and forth between names. Finding a boy’s name was very easy for us, but a girl’s name is proving to be surprisingly difficult.

Our goal is for her name to be feminine, pretty, vintage. We’d like it to stand the test of time, to suit her in both childhood and adulthood. We like “old lady” names that are spelled traditionally. Our surname is a difficult one to spell and pronounce – Mifsud. So, choosing a name that is simple to spell and say is really important.

We plan to have two children and have already picked a boy’s name for future use. We want to choose a girl’s name that would match nicely. The boy’s name we have chosen is Oscar Reuben. We LOVE this name :)

Our finalist names are:

Adeline
Ava
Elsie

Ava – We like that it’s short, feminine, sweet and can’t possibly be misspelled. It gives an old school glamor (think Ava Gardner) that I really love. Because we have a surname that is hard to spell, I enjoy the simplicity of Ava. I like that it has a sweetness to it, but with a spunky edge. However, my reservation is that Ava could be too common and dare I say it, “boring”. I wouldn’t want to use my favorite choice of middle name here, which is Grace, because I know how popular the combination of Ava Grace is. I would probably go for Ava Violet instead (violets being the birth flower of February, when she’s due). I work as a teacher, but am yet to come across a little Ava. Am I alone here? Is Ava actually really overused and I just haven’t come across any as yet? As a teacher, I’m conscious of the fact that certain names become repetitive and want to avoid this for our daughter if possible. I’d hate for her to have to be referred to as “Ava M.”

Adeline – My husband has always loved this one. It has the most syllables of the names on our list, which also opens her up to the nickname Addie, or possibly even Ada. This name has an elegance about it and again, that olden day, glamorous feel. I would also be able to use Grace for her middle name, because I think Adeline isn’t a common choice (I could be wrong, though.) The downsides to consider…firstly, spelling. I worry that due to it being an unusual name, people may spell it “Adaline” instead (which one is the traditional spelling, out of interest – Adeline or Adaline?) Secondly, pronunciation. I want her name to be pronounced “Ad-ah-line”, not “Ad-ah-lyn”. Do you think we’d experience confusion here? Thirdly, is this name too similar to Madeline? I don’t like this name very much (purely because I’ve taught too many Madelines in my time, nothing personal against the name!)

Elsie – This name is pretty, sweet, very “old lady”. It is another name that I believe to be more uncommon than Ava. I think it’s really feminine, but also a little bit spunky. This name has also been the longest standing one on our list of names. I would happily use Grace for her middle name – Elsie Grace has a nice flow to it. But, does Elsie sound too much like a nickname? Will people assume it’s short for Elsa or Elsbeth? Is it too “cutesy” for when she becomes a woman one day (for example, could you see a lawyer named Elsie?) My other consideration is that when people look at her name, would they go to call her Elise instead. I certainly don’t like the name Elise as much, so want to avoid this happening.

I really hope you can enlighten us and help ease my confusion. I know that we still have a few months left to make our decision, but would love to start calling baby Mifsud by her name when we speak to her through my belly :)

 

The Social Security website can help us out a bit here: nationally, in 2012, here are the rankings of the three names in the U.S.:

Ava: #5
Adeline: #239
Elsie: #397

Ava has been in the Top 10 since 2005; whether it’s likely you’d see them in the classroom would depend on what grade you teach, and your area of the country. If you teach K-3, the wave has hit and you have a good idea of what the popularity of the name means for your area; if you teach grade 4 or higher, it may not yet have arrived. But I have two third graders and a first grader, and so far we have seen only one Ava in a classroom.

While I have not yet encountered this myself, I have been assured that a number of parents are naming their babies Eva but pronouncing it the same as Ava. I don’t know how prevalent this is, but I mention it because of your preference for a name that can’t be spelled any other way.

Adeline is much, much less common than Ava, according to the chart. What the chart doesn’t tell us, though, is that Addy/Maddy names have, as a batch, become very popular. It started with Madison and Addison and Madeline/Madelyn, and now parents are going further and further out to get those nicknames. The name Adeline has been rising rapidly: in 1998 it wasn’t even in the Top 1000, but look how it’s jumped up since then:

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

As Madison led to Addison, Madelyn has led to Adelyn: that name is moving even more rapidly from it’s Top 1000 debut in 2007 (and this shows only one of the many spellings):

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

Because of that rapid rise, and based on the pronunciation confusion that already exists with MadeLINE vs. MadeLIN, I do think the pronunciation of Adeline might be one of the name’s issues. That doesn’t mean it’s off the list, but it would be something to be braced for in advance. The spelling may also be an issue: I do think you’ll see both Adaline and Adeline. The Oxford Dictionary of First Names lists Adeline but not Adaline (Adeline comes from the name Adele), leading me to think that Adeline is the standard/traditional. Usage-wise, the spelling Adeline was given to 1327 U.S. baby girls in 2012, and the spelling Adaline was given to only 138.

If you like Ava and are considering Ada as a nickname for Adeline, one option would be to use Ada.

Elsie is the least common of the three, but it taps into another trend: the quest for names that give the nickname Ella/Ellie. Elsie appeared in the Top 1000 in 2005, when the popularity of the name Ella (#23 that year and still rising) was causing parents to quest for something similar but different (Elsa is rising as well, but less rapidly):

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

(screen shot from SSA.gov)

We recently covered whether we thought Elsie would be mistaken for Elise, and the consensus was no, it wouldn’t be: Baby Naming Issue: Elise or Elyse?

Elsie does sound nicknamey to me. I would prefer Elsa with the nickname Elsie myself, but plenty of parents are going straight to Elsie. Are you opposed to using Elsa? It eliminates your one concern with the name.

All three names seem to me to go equally well with a potential future brother Oscar. All three names seem to me to pair up nicely, if you have a second girl and want to use a second name from the list. My own top choice based on your preferences would be Elsa with the nickname Elsie. Elsa Mifsud; Elsa and Oscar.

Would you want to consider Grace as the first name? It’s a lovely choice, easy to spell and pronounce, and the nickname Gracie reminds me of Elsie. At #21 in 2012, it’s fairly common, but it’s steadier than the other choices: it’s been hovering in the teens and twenties since 1999, never hitting the Top 10.

 

Let’s have a poll to see what everyone else thinks:

[yop_poll id=”37″]

 

Baby Name to Consider: Avoca

M. writes:

Hello!

I just have to say that I LOVE reading your blog. I tend to have a very classic but not super common naming style, and I love reading the wide variety of options on your blog!

I am not currently pregnant (and no plans any time soon), but I have a HUGE name obsession. To the point where I routinely find a name I like and text it to all of my friends, thereafter googling and scanning for possible nicknames (to me, nicknames are HUGE).

I could write you a dozen different e-mails about so many names that I love and combinations I like…but I’m writing because I have one specific name in mind that I am obsessed with…but can find very little about online. Not to mention, I have a nickname in mind that I need a little clarity with.

Some back story: my boyfriend and I used to be in a long-distance relationship. It was generally a 7 road trip to visit each other a few times a month. One such route between our homes often took me past a sign for a town called Avoca.

Avoca is an Irish name, and a common one for “places.” Not to mention, I’ve seen Avoca cookbooks, Avoca blankets, and so forth. It is NOT as common for a little girl’s name. But I just love it. I am Irish, and seeing it in print reminds me of all of those trips my boyfriend and I made to see each other!

I think it is absolutely an adorable name for a little girl, and something that also solves a conundrum I’ve had for awhile: Namely, I have loved the name Ava since I was a little girl. But it is now SO popular, I would never consider that to be my (future, some day) child’s full name. Also, I am obsessed with nicknames and there is no strong contender from the name Ava (and yes, names without a decent nickname are a deal breaker for me).

However, Avoca…pronounced Ah-VOH-ka…could provide me with the missing link.

Now for question time:

a) is this unusual name “right” for a little girl? Does it sound too much like Avocado?
a1) Is it SO unusual that people would hate it (I don’t generally care about what other people think, but I myself hate when people get too “out there” with names: this is something your child must live with FOREVER! Not you: THEM!).

b) Does the fact that Avoca starts with an AH sound as opposed to Ava’s AY sound make the two NOT sync up enough for a nickname cross over?
b1) If so, what other nickname suggestions are there?
b2) Would pronouncing it Ay-VOH-ka help?

Thank you so much for your help!

 

I hadn’t immediately noticed the avocado connection. My first association was with vocations and Latin and church and Ave Maria: it looks to me like it could be the name of a song or blessing to begin the church service. But once you mentioned avocados, I’m afraid I kept seeing it.

Furthermore, when I first saw the name and was guessing at its pronunciation before getting to that part of the email, I pronounced it correctly—though I would have said it aloud with a question mark at the end, not certain I had it right. But as soon as I saw the avocado connection, it threw off my pronunciation and I had to stop and think each time to keep from saying it with the avocado emphasis.

As to whether it’s too unusual, it’s beyond the point where I would use the word “unusual”: it is in fact currently unused in the United States. But it has many name-like qualities: it begins with the currently stylish Av- sound (Ava, Avery), and it ends with an -a as many girl names do. In the middle is the long-O sound, which is also currently in style (Olivia, Sophia, Zoe, Chloe, Noah, Logan, Owen). Those three things combined make it seem unusual to me, but not TOO unusual—especially since you have a story for the origin of the name. Instead it sounds to me like a name from another language that I just haven’t heard before.

Ava does not seem like a natural nickname for it, however. The only sound in common is the V: AY-vuh and ah-VOH have nothing else in common, not even emphasis. I also think calling her Ava would throw off the pronunciation of the full name: if I knew the nickname was Ava, I’d think Avoca must be pronounced more like AY-vock-uh or ay-VOCK-uh.

But no, I wouldn’t change the pronunciation. It’s more confusing, and it seems odd to change the sentimental town name’s pronunciation, and it also feels like a reach: lots of people wish the name Ava weren’t so popular, but it just IS that popular, and forcing a connection to a less-popular name doesn’t make the name Ava any less common—it just makes it feel as if the parents thought it did.

The final blow is that Ava doesn’t seem like a nickname name; it seems like a stand-alone name. If I hear of a girl named Annie, or Evie, or Lucy, I might wonder if it could be a nickname; if I hear Anna, or Eva, or Luca, I first assume it’s the full name. Certainly some nicknames DO end in -a and ARE also stand-alone names (an Annabel could certain go by Anna or an Emmaline could go by Emma, and there’s Eleanor/Nora and Margaret/Greta and Isabella/Bella), but it’s not as familiar a format in the United States: nicknames for girls have more often ended in the -ie sound, or have been a syllable of the full name with or without the -ie sound (Abby for Abigail, not Abba; Susie or Sue for Susan, not Susa; Becky for Rebekah, not Reba; Mandy for Amanda, not Ama). When an -a is used, it seems to come more often from the end of the name: Manda for Amanda, Bekah for Rebeckah, Nora for Eleanor. It might still work fine if Ava were known as a nickname the way Bella and Nora and Greta are, or if Ava were known to be related to the name Avoca: traditional usage covers a multitude of inconsistencies. But by using a unique name, and then wanting as a nickname an unrelated and very common stand-alone name in a non-typical nickname format, I feel like we’re exceeding the Stretch Limit.

Although, wait. Something else occurs to me. I originally started this paragraph by saying, “However, this doesn’t mean I think you CAN’T do it: if I encountered an actual Avoca going by Ava, I might initially think ‘exceeds the Stretch Limit’ and then I wouldn’t give it any thought after that, and in fact might not even remember I’d ever even thought of it as a stretch”—but as I wrote that out, I realized the situation was better than that. Because what I might actually assume is that the parents wanted to use the very unusual town name as a sentimental name, and then they wanted to give her a more familiar name for everyday use. Yes, I think that’s what I might very well think—and what I might very well SAY, if I were the parent. And when I spin it that way, it completely undoes the Stretch Limit effect—as well as making the name Avoca feel even more usable. (Although it would be better still if it were a town you’d met your boyfriend in or visited your boyfriend in, rather than a town name you drove past on the road.)

I am not succeeding in coming up with alternate nicknames. Sometimes something will occur to me if I say the name again and again, but I’m not coming up with anything that seems viable. Vo, Vokie, Avvie—actually, I think I’d go with Avvie. It’s so similar to Abby, just a V-sound instead of a B-sound, and it feels like the nickname that would happen naturally if you didn’t try to come up with one.

One final concern is that you say you have a very classic naming style. Will you be able to think of sibling names you like with the name Avoca?

If Ava is more your style, and the only reasons you wouldn’t use it are its popularity and its lack of a nickname, I might suggest a double first name such as Ava Louise, with a nickname like Ava-Lou.

 

Let’s have a poll to see what everyone else thinks of the name Avoca:

[yop_poll id=”36″]

 

Baby Naming Issue: Collecting Thoughts and Experiences on Common Names

L. writes:

I have a question about name popularity.

My own name is very unusual, but it is different from a common name by
only one letter. I have spent my life correcting people and spelling
my name out, and it is a PAIN. I would like to choose a classic, easy
to spell and easy to pronounce name for my child.

At the same time, I have wanted to stay away from really common names.
I remember all the Sara’s and Sarah’s in college and how they all had
to go by their last name. There were even Sara’s rooming with each
other! It seemed like a pain. As an adult, I notice all the Chris’s.
Combined with the women who are Christina and Kristina and go by
Chris or Kris, it is downright confusing! They seem to be everywhere
and you always have to use a last name.

So, I started out trying to avoid the top 50 or so popular names in my
state, and it eliminated many of my top choices. In particular, I
love the name the Jack. But Jack, Jackson, and John all top the
popularity chart in my State. So, I had nixed the name until I read
somewhere that the top names these days account for a much smaller
percentage of babies than they did back when the Chris’s and Sara’s
were born. So, I did the math. In 2012, Jack, Jackson, or John
accounted for a total of 131 births out of 12,754 births in my state.
So, only 1% of births. Theoretically, it seems like at that
percentage, you would have a small chance of having, say, more than
one Jack in a kindergarten class. Or, when he grows up, having his
electrician, his boss, and his plumber all also named Jack.

I will admit, that even after doing the math, I do still feel a little
bit of “everyone will think I’m so boring for choosing a common name.”
But, I think my happiness over being able to use some of the top
names would override that feeling.

I am curious your thoughts and the thoughts and experiences of your
users r.e. common names.

 

All four of my boys have Top 50 names. One of them has name that was Top 10 in our state the year he was born; in several school years, he has had one or two other boys with the same name in his classroom—but they are the same boys. That is, it’s not that there are so very many Williams that he’s very likely to have two or three in his class, it’s that there are two other Williams in his same grade who are frequently in the same class with him while other classrooms have zero Williams because his classroom is hogging them all. There were nearly twice as many Jacobs born in our state that same year, and yet he hasn’t had two Jacobs in a classroom.

My other three boys have names more in the 30s rankings, and so far none of them have ever had a boy with the same name in their classroom.

I did worry slightly that people would find the names boring—but on the other hand, when I considered less-common names I worried people would find them weird, so I found I worried either way. And what I found after naming all my babies and reacting to all my friends and relatives naming THEIR babies is that hardly anyone really cares what you name your baby. They might have a few seconds of thinking, “Oh, great, ANOTHER _____” or “Wow, that’s pretty unusual!”—but it will be a fleeting reaction, because they don’t deep-down care.

As you can imagine, I am VERY KEEN to see the class list every year, and usually I have to wait until Valentine’s Day to see it. It is not uncommon to have two children with the same name in a classroom. But it is not uncommon NOT to have any duplicates, either: many class lists come home without a single duplicate. More often there are two children with similar names: a Madison and a Madelyn who both go by Maddy, for example, or a Jaiden and an Aiden, or a Kayla and a Mikayla.

As you’ve found in your research, the current top baby names are not as common as the top names were when we were growing up. Jennifer, for example, was given to over FOUR PERCENT of baby girls at its peak—that’s FOUR TIMES the number of Jack, Jackson, and John COMBINED for current babies in your state. The name Sarah was a Top 10 name from 1978 until 2002—TWENTY-FIVE CONSECUTIVE YEARS of being in the Top 10! Combined with the spelling Sara (which didn’t hit the Top 10, but was Top 50 from 1976 until 1999), that is a LOT of Sara/Sarah—especially in settings where the popular sound of the name was made even more appealing by religious significance.

The only thing that might come close to that today is the -aden name trend (Aiden, Brayden, Caden, Hayden, Jaiden, etc.) or the Maddy/Addy trend (Madison, Madelyn, Addison, Adelyn, etc.). No single name gets anywhere close.

And with a traditional choice like John or Jack, popular for generations or even for thousands of years, I don’t think you’ll be sorry: a name that suddenly hits the Top 10 and then ducks right back out is one thing, but an enduringly popular classic is quite another.

********

Have you given your child a relatively common name—a name you KNEW was relatively common when you chose it? (It can be quite a different thing to choose a name not knowing it was or would soon be so common.) What has been your experience with that?

Baby Name Issues That Weren’t Important in the Long Run

I was thinking today about some of the things I was worried about when choosing my babies’ names, and how little those things ended up mattering in the long run. Here were a few of my worries:

• The initials of two names spelled something like I.V.—not negative, exactly, but you wouldn’t call them positive either, and they definitely called something to mind

• One name had so many syllables—TOO many?

• One name had three really good middle-name candidates, very hard to choose

• One name was much less common than our usual style

• One name repeated two sounds of an already-used name

• One name was very close to my brother’s name, while not actually being my brother’s name

• One name was more common than our usual style

• One middle name wasn’t a family name, when we’d been using family names as middle names

• One name we liked quite a bit, and it was the only one we agreed on, but we didn’t LOVE it

• One name was a family honor name, but we hadn’t done any other family honor names as first names

• One name was hard to spell

• One middle name was an honor name of someone we wanted to honor, but we really didn’t like the name—and the name was also the name of one of my serious ex-boyfriends

• One name was not the most common spelling of a name

• Two names came from a TV show

• Our twin names were quite different in style and length

• I worried that two middle names would be a hassle, or that it wasn’t a good idea to put my maiden name in there

• A baby name book said our favorite boy name would “go girl”; I disagreed…and yet, I worried the book was right and I was wrong

• One name was only one syllable and I worried it was too choppy and/or would be nicknamed because of it

• One name seemed like it might indicate religious affiliation

 

When I look over this list now, it is not TOO hard to re-create the feelings of anxiety I had over all these issues—and yet they matter so little now. Looking down the list and evaluating each one:

The initials of two names spelled something like I.V.—not negative, exactly, but you wouldn’t call them positive either, and they definitely called something to mind: no one has mentioned it to us or to the child, and it has not bothered me; I think of it every so often in an “oh, yeah, I forgot about that!” sort of way.

One name had so many syllables—TOO many?: Not an issue at all; if anything, it’s made me like longer names more.

One name had three really good middle-name candidates, very hard to choose: I’m glad we chose the one we did, but I think I’d feel the same way if we’d chosen either of the two others.

One name was much less common than our usual style: I’m so glad we went with it, and I love it, and I doubt anyone cares that it’s less common than the others.

One name repeated two sounds of an already-used name: Hasn’t been an issue.

One name was very close to my brother’s name, while not actually being my brother’s name: A few times, I’ve called the child by my brother’s name or my brother by the child’s name, which has been fine; a few times, I’ve wished we’d just gone ahead and used my brother’s name, since I don’t think it would have been as confusing as we’d feared it would be.

One name was more common than our usual style: Periodically I regret that the name is so common—but I don’t regret using the name, because the type of person we envisioned when we thought of that name is the type of person the child IS, which is fun.

Two middle names aren’t family names, and three are: No one cares, including us—and no one mentioned it when our third and fourth children didn’t have family middle names after our first two children did.

One name we liked quite a bit, and it was the only one we agreed on, but we didn’t LOVE it: Now it seems perfect.

One name was a family honor name, but we hadn’t done any other family honor names as first names: No one cares, including us; if anything, I’m glad we saved the honor name for a non-first child, so that no one expected us to keep that up.

One name was hard to spell and was not the most common spelling of the name, but for a good reason: Sometimes it gets misspelled; at those times, we correct the spelling; no regret on using the spelling, because it was worth it.

One middle name was an honor name of someone we wanted to honor, but we really didn’t like the name—and the name was also the name of one of my serious ex-boyfriends: I did have to tell the ex-boyfriend directly that it wasn’t after him (he remarked on it as if it were significant, so I corrected him), but that was not a big deal; the honored person was so pleased and I think of him each time I think of the name, and I’m so glad we used it.

Two names came from a TV show: No one cares, including us.

Our twin names were quite different in style and length: When I was first telling people their names, I did feel like there was a little let-down feeling among the people I was telling: they’d hoped for something more TWINNY. But that has not mattered in the long run. And although I DO wish we’d been able to find names we loved that were more twinny, I’m happy with each name individually.

I worried that two middle names would be a hassle, or that it wasn’t a good idea to put my maiden name in there: I can count on one hand the number of times we had to deal with it—and all of the issues were minor. For example, once a school thought that the child had two surnames, and once a school though the child had two first names; both times, I just sent in a note making the correction. We also found that sometimes forms only allow for one middle initial. Now that I know what kind of errors can be made, I am just very clear when I fill out paperwork for the first time (and I chose a consistent middle initial for each of us, for times when we can only have one), and I don’t think we’ve had an error in years. Meanwhile, I feel very very happy that they have my maiden name in there, and I feel freshly happy every time I fill out paperwork.

A baby name book said our favorite boy name would “go girl”; I disagreed…and yet, I worried the book was right and I was wrong: I was right and the book was wrong.

One name was only one syllable and I worried it was too choppy and/or would be nicknamed because of it: No.

One name seemed like it might indicate religious affiliation: It’s possible it does, especially when combined with a larger family—but it hasn’t come up, and we haven’t found it to be a problem.

 

I do think names are important. I do think they deserve a lot of thought and care. But I think there are a lot of issues that SEEM important during the naming process, but then they don’t turn out to be important in the long run. Have you found this to be the case, too? What things were you anxious about during the naming process that turned out to be unimportant in the long run?

Baby Girl or Boy W., Sibling to Atticus and Elm 2

Amy writes:

I’ve thought I had our baby name situation locked down, twice, and now it’s falling apart… again. I wrote to you a few months ago about our 3rd and probably last baby, and you and your readers helped my husband and I pick a lovely girl name we’re both very happy with from your comments. Shortly after, my husband decided Orion was completely off the table so then we had to start looking for boy names. My husband has a very Scottish middle name, his grandmother’s maiden name, but a name we would never use (Craigie). So we started looking for other Scottish or Gaelic names and found Sullivan nn Sully. I liked it, he agreed, and I thought we were set. But it kept nagging at me. I really do like the name Sully but I don’t love it, it doesn’t have a strong connection for us and I don’t think it flows particularly well with Atticus and Elm. I told my husband I want to open up the discussion of boy names again and he agreed he doesn’t want to use a name I feel so lukewarm about.

So! Now here we are with still plenty of time (the baby is due the first week of February) but no boy name. It doesn’t have to be Scottish by any stretch, the only rules are still that it can’t start with W and you have to be able to pronounce it on sight. Other names we have liked besides Orion and Sullivan but that have been nixed along the way for various reasons are August, Callum, Felix, Finnian, and Phoenix.

Any help you and your readers could give to finally stop this madness would be much appreciated!

 

 

Name update! Amy writes:

I wrote to you several times this pregnancy (Baby W, sibling to Atticus & Elm) and you & your readers were so helpful. My husband and I read through your reply & all the comments multiple times. We quickly & easily agreed on Ivy Beck W. as our girl name after several people suggested it in the first post. The boy name was trickier & at different points we had settled on Sullivan nn Sully then Hawthorn nn Hawk when two days before the birth we both decided it just didn’t feel right and went back to our original choice, Orion. I think secretly we were both expecting a girl and thought maybe that’s why we’d had so much uncertainty about a boy name. But surprise! It IS a boy and we’re thrilled. Orion Cash W., 2/10/14, 9 lbs 5 oz! (middle name honors my husband’s best friend). He and his name are both perfect- thank you again for all your help!

photo

Baby Boy Wrightmen, Brother to Bennett: An Honor Name Issue

Katie writes:

My husband and I are Katie and Kevin and our last name sounds like Wrightmen. We are due with our second boy this March.

We love our son’s name and it fits him perfectly. Bennett Patrick (after my mom, Patricia, who passed away). Bennett we both came to love due to us each having a student with the name. (We are both teachers which can make naming a child hard!) we feel like it is classic and classy and fits well for a baby as well as a grown man.

Of course, we had our perfect girls’ name all set- Annabelle Joy. After the Ann in my/my mom’s middle name. And we loved Bennett and Belle or Bella. Or even Elle or Ella, or Annabelle or Anna.

The boys name we are deciding between are these options:

William Joseph (after both of our fathers)
Joseph William (“Joey” when a baby Joe or Joseph as he grows up)
Charles William (Charles is my dad’s middle name, and was a contender last time but we couldn’t agree on a nickname. I wanted Charles or Chase, my husband wanted Charlie.

Our number one is William Joseph. I like William Charles better, but it seems like a slight to choose not choose my dad’s first name, especially if it’s only the middle name spot and if we are choosing my father in law’s first name as our son’s first name as well. The reason we don’t mind this is because my father in law only goes by Bill, and I don’t think of him as a William. I have always loved the name because Prince William and I were born on the same day. My husband shot it down the first round, but is open this time.

So, the problems are here:

My husband does not want William to have any nickname, not Will or Liam or anything. He only wants William. He does not want his dad’s family to refer to our baby as “little willy” as they called his dad when he was younger. He especially does not want him to be “little bill”. He does not think his dad deserves that honor, but likes the name William.

We both used to not be close with our fathers due to poor choices they made during their marriages. In time and forgiveness, we have grown very close with each of our fathers and they have grown to be wonderful, involved grandpas who love their grandsons and support us. When I brought up the idea of the name, I said even though they didn’t make good choices years ago, we are teaching our sons forgiveness, the importance of valuing family and honoring the people they are now. And it’s easy to say “you are named after both of your grandfathers” which is cool. I love the names and I think it’s perfect.

So- is there a nice way to say, “we are calling him William, no nicknames please?”

The other thing- my husbands mom and sister still has a hard time with resentment towards his dad, even to the point where they resent how close we are now. We know they may be turned off by the name or think it’s weird we chose to name our son after our fathers. Should I even care about that? Suggestions on how to tell them (it will be after the baby is born) Or do we just say the name and they can get over it?

I feel like William and Joseph are both common enough names that it wouldn’t be a big deal? It’s not like this is the only William they will ever encounter.

Aside from the nickname, and my husband worrying about his family’s opinion, we love the names (individually and their meaning). Although at times he thinks his dad doesn’t “deserve” to have a son named after him.

I feel like Bennett and William couldn’t be cuter together, and we have found ourselves hooked on the double letters and feel like that might be our childrens’ “name connection”. We hope to have Bennett, William (?) and Annabelle one day.

Other choices included:

Reed (which I liked because our last name starts with R as well, but didn’t know if it would be strong or weird, my husband thought he may be called “weed whiteman” instead of reed Wrightmen)

Matthew- love! I just have a cousin named Matthew, will likely use for 3rd boy

Noah (the only non-double letter name we both loved, was just used by a cousin for her boy)

Lillianna or Reese for a girl

So
1. Suggestions on spreading the no nickname rule
2. Suggestions on sharing the name with people who may not be happy about it
3. Is William Joseph the right name?

Thanks, swistle! I look forward to hearing your views and the comments from your wise readers! You always have smart, clear kind advice. Thank you in advance!

 

It sounds to me from your letter as if the name William has too much baggage and too many issues to be a good first-name candidate. I think you might be able to avoid nicknames (though he may very well choose one himself later on)—especially Billy and Bill and Willy, which are hardly used at all by this generation of babies. But it depends almost completely on your particular families and the extent to which they go with what you ask them to do, and there’s no nice way to say, “We named him William, but please don’t use nicknames because it might accidentally honor his grandfather who doesn’t deserve that honor.”

People will very likely assume it’s an honor name, and quite a high honor at that, and so family members who would have a problem with that are likely to have a problem with that. You could go to those family members and say, “It’s just because we liked the name—it’s not after Dad,” but I’m imagining how I’d feel if a baby I loved was given the name of my ex-husband who had behaved very badly and left some very bad memories, and it’s not going over well in my imagination. It’s possible it would redeem the name, but that might be a hard road.

If you were crazy about the name William, if your own father and beloved brother were also named William, if it was the only name you both loved and agreed on—in those sorts of situations, you would hear me saying it probably wouldn’t be too bad. The relatives could probably be soothed. Your father-in-law couldn’t be told the name didn’t honor him (especially since it does, and you’d be actively telling your son it does), but perhaps everyone would understand the explanation about forgiveness/redemption. But it sounds to me that although you really like the name William, it’s just one of a number of good options, and your husband has only recently come around to it. It also sounds like you like the symbolism of using it, but your husband’s actual feelings don’t line up with that symbolism: the relationship may have significantly improved, but your husband is still saying his father doesn’t deserve the honor of a namesake. Overall, it looks to me as if the arguments for NOT using it far outweigh the reasons for using it.

If you would like to use both grandfather’s names, I think William is perfect as the middle name. It reduces the impact of the namesake (and doesn’t force your husband’s mother and sister to use it regularly), and eliminates nickname issues. If you are still not in agreement on a nickname for the name Charles, you could either each use your own nickname and see which one pans out as his own favorite (this works if you are both fine with all the possible outcomes of this), or you could use Joseph. I think it’s fine that it isn’t your dad’s first name, and I even like the balance of it: your dad’s MIDDLE name as the FIRST name, and your husband’s dad’s FIRST name as the MIDDLE name. (If you use your father-in-law’s first name as the first name, though, I agree it would be better to use your father’s first name as the middle name.)

If you do use William as the first name, or if you think your husband’s family will object to it even as a middle name, I would tell them very gently and understandingly (and ideally on their own, without your father-in-law present), and I would emphasize your non-father-in-law reasons for liking the name, including the Prince William connection. I would say to them what you said to us about your father-in-law seeming like “Bill”—totally unconnected to William. I’d tell them that your husband had very mixed feelings about honoring his dad, but that the two of you agreed it symbolized your son’s relationship with his grandfather more than your husband’s relationship with his dad.

It would be a little easier, I think, if your husband’s mother and sister had already been honored: as I’m writing all this out it feels a little wrong to be honoring/forgiving the former bad guy before honoring the ones who were good all along (if they indeed were), and increases my feelings that this name has too much baggage to be worth using.

A fun idea just occurred to me. What if you were to name your son George, making a two-generation connection between you and Prince William?

 

 

Name update! Katie writes:

I wrote you about whether or not to name our son after both grandfathers (sounds like Wrightmen).  We ultimately decided that William was out as a first name option due to the overwhelming response, and now we can see, he is very much not a William.  We decided to go with the name Matthew with William as the middle name (and can share the middle name with my husband) for the longest time.  Matthew is a name we both love and it would be a male M name to honor my mother in law, Martha.  At the last minute we decided to add my dad’s name as a second middle name, so we could honor all three living grandparents and not leave anyone out.  Thank you for your wonderful input and help making the right decision.

Matthew William Joseph
March 16, 2014

imagemw

Baby Boy Fort-with-a-Sh, Brother to Henry and Isabel

A. writes:

We are closing in our due date (Thanksgiving!) with our 3rd (and likely last) child, a boy, and are having a very hard time naming him. Our last name sounds like “Fort” but starts with an “Sh”. We already have two children, named Henry Ervin and Isabel Louise. Their middle names honor deceased relatives (because I am Jewish, we won’t honor living relatives through naming).

We generally prefer traditional names, but something like William or John/Jack feels too common. We have considered and rejected Charles/Charlie (I love it, but my husband does not), David (awkward familial association), and Daniel (for some reason, it doesn’t sound “strong” enough to either of us). For a brief time, we considered Jason but have fallen away from it as perhaps too much of our own generation and also perhaps not quite strong enough (in the same vein as Daniel). We would like to use either Daniel or Edward as a middle name, though, as they happen to follow our tradition of honoring deceased relatives with the middle name.

We seem to have happened into a short list of three favorites, none of which affirmatively feels just right at the moment. They are Malcolm, Brendan, and Patrick. Can you help with these (or make other suggestions)? Thank you very much!

 

I wonder if you’d like Nathaniel? Or perhaps it would have the same issues as Daniel. Henry, Isabel, and Nathaniel.

Because Paul and I had Henry, Charlie, Daniel, and Malcolm on our own name list, I’ll suggest a few more where perhaps our styles overlap:

Calvin
Edmund
Elliot (ends with T like surname)
Everett (ends with T like surname)
Felix (-x may blend uncomfortably with Sh-)
Frederick
Nicholas (-s may blend uncomfortably with Sh-)
Oliver
Simon (starts with S like surname)

Of these, my favorite is Oliver. Henry, Isabel, and Oliver. I also like Calvin and Everett and Elliot and Edmund. Simon would probably be my top choice except that I’m not personally as fond of alliteration; if you do like it, then Henry, Isabel, and Simon is at or near the top of my list.

I lean toward the ones without natural one-syllable nicknames: Ed __ort, Nick __ort, Fred __ort all sound a little abrupt to me. Calvin is an exception, I think because the softer L-ending is less choppy, and also because I know a Calvin who goes just by Calvin. But I think any of them are fine: it’s only a leaning, and so many kids don’t use nicknames now anyway.

I have a strong favorite among your three finalists (Malcolm, Brendan, Patrick): Malcolm. I like Malcolm Edward. Let’s have a poll to see what everyone else likes best:

[yop_poll id=”35″]

 

 

Name update! A. writes:

Thank you for posting our naming question for our third child and second son, brother to Henry and Isabel.  You and your readers offered much helpful insight.  Your favorite and the winning poll choice was Malcolm, which I love but about which my husband had some reservations.  My husband discovered the name Callum, which has the same Latin root as Malcolm (meaning = dove) and is occasionally used as a nickname therefor in Scotland.  Callum also shares properties with a name you suggested, Calvin (possible nn Cal), that we hadn’t considered before.  We fell for this name in a way we hadn’t about any other name we’d considered.  Callum Daniel was born 11/21/13, and we are all doing well.  Thank you so much! Happy Holidays!

Baby Boy Donner-with-a-C, a 7-Letter Brother to Brayden

Allison writes:

I love your blog and was reading it even before being pregnant. I am hoping you will be able to help with our baby naming dilemma.

We have baby boy # 2 arriving in 25 days. My husband and I cannot agree on a name and are starting to panic. My husband has now resorted to throwing out random names that we have never even considered just hoping something sticks.

My name is Allison and my husband’s name is Vincent. Our last name is Donner with a C. We already have a 5 year old son named Brayden. His middle name is a family name and is shared by his father and grandfather. Baby # 2 is a boy and will be our last child.

Before you read any further I will throw out the hardest part of our baby naming conundrum. My husband, myself, and our first son all have seven letters in our first names and I really want this baby to have a seven letter name also. Since we are not having any more children, I think we should be able to accomplish this.

My husband loves the name Patrick. We found out we were pregnant St. Patrick’s weekend and his family has Irish roots so he thinks the name is perfect. Patrick was also on the list when we had our first son. I feel like I rejected the name for our first child so why would I choose it for this child? Also, when we first got pregnant with this child I told several people I “hated” the name Patrick and now feel like I backed myself into a corner. To be honest, I do not “hate” the name Patrick but I do not like the obvious nicknames of Pat and Rick and would be very upset if people called my son by either of those nicknames. I also feel like my husband and his family are really pulling for Patrick and feel a bit pushed into the name.

The middle name won’t be as difficult. Since our first son’s middle name came from my husband’s side of the family this son’s middle name will come from my side of the family. We have several contenders we like and are waiting to choose a first name to see what fits.

Names we have on our list for this baby are:

Patrick (husband’s favorite)
Bennett (my favorite for a long time but husband doesn’t care for it and I am starting to fall out of love with it because I’m afraid people won’t think of it as a first name)
Griffin (husband doesn’t like)
Beckett (husband doesn’t like and I’m Just throwing this one in there so you can see my style)
Everett (husband doesn’t like)
Grayson (used to love but seems like it’s going to the girls)
Jackson (getting a bit too popular for me and we know people who have already used this name though we hardly ever see this family)
Garrett (my husband likes but I prefer Griffin; I don’t understand why he likes Garrett but not Griffin)
Henry (totally different than my style but one of my all time favorite names; this is a family name and is on the list of middle name contenders)

My husband likes fairly traditional names such as Andrew, Zachary, and Ian but these aren’t really my style. However, I could commit to a more traditional name if it had seven letters. It’s really hard for me to describe my baby naming style but I like names that are a little trendy without being strange. When we chose Brayden we did not know any Brayden’s but it was still a name that people recognized and wasn’t weird. The name has now gotten much more popular and my son’s had multiple Brayden’s in his pre-k class and now at kindergarten. I really felt like Bennett fit into my style but my husband has never heard the name used as a first name so he thinks it’s not really a name.

If this baby had been a girl our top contender was Emma Claire. Yes, I know it’s extremely popular but we loved the first/middle name combination and might have chosen it despite its popularity and despite the fact that it didn’t have seven letters.

I read your blog every day and we also purchased a copy of the baby name wizard and are still no closer to choosing a name.

If you have any names we should be considering that we have not thought of we would love yours and your readers suggestions.

Thank you!

 

It sounds to me as if the name Patrick is out. It also sounds to me as if this needs to be made completely clear to your husband, and then perhaps he could make it clear to his family (without blaming you): he could use a friendly, casual tone and say something like, “Oh—no, Patrick was a name we considered but it isn’t one of our finalists. We’re still looking for the right name.”

If your husband and his family like the St. Patrick’s Day / Irish connection, then I’d start by looking at other Irish names:

Finnian
Garrett (on your list already)
Griffin (on your list already)
Malcolm
Tiernan

Finnian is close to Griffin, but perhaps your husband will like it.

Because Brayden is a more modern name, I think I’d look for similar options: Andrew and Patrick don’t feel like good fits to me, but Grayson and Beckett do.

Bennett certainly seems like a first name to me (it was #202 in 2012, used for 1891 new baby boys that year), even though it’s a surname name. Because your surname is a common boys’ first name, I do think you’re likely to get less confusion if you choose a first name that doesn’t sound surnamey. On the other hand, a certain amount of confusion is likely to happen no matter what. In this case, my hope is that your husband’s only objection to it is that he’s never happened to meet a child with the name, and that looking at the numbers will cure him of that. It seems to me like Bennett fits all of your preferences and also is good with Brayden.

Chopping down the list to remove the names you don’t like and the names your husband doesn’t like, we’re left with:

Grayson
Jackson
Garrett

Garrett seems the least surnamey of those to me, but that would be so subjective: if I knew a family with the surname Garrett instead of a family with the surname Grayson and another with the surname Jackson, I might be choosing completely differently.

Grayson does not seem to me to be going to the girls, especially with that spelling. Here are the 2012 numbers for the spellings used for more than 25 babies that year:

Gracen: 73 F, 64 M
Graceyn: 26 F
Gracin: 34 M
Gracyn: 209 F
Graeson: 48 M
Graycen: 47 F, 28 M
Graysen: 45 F, 205 M
Grayson: 177 F, 4671 M
Greysen: 116 M
Greyson: 40 F, 2216 M

Adding those up, that’s 617 girls and 7382 boys. It’s a somewhat unisex name used much more often for boys.

A bigger issue for me is that Grayson and Brayden sound quite similar. Maybe not too similar to use, but similar enough to make me hesitate to throw support behind Grayson.

Because you like Beckett, Bennett, Garrett, and Everett, I wonder if you would like Elliott or Barrett or Merritt. I wish Emmett had 7 letters: it’s similar to your favorite girl name, plus it has the double-T.

 

 

Name update! Allison writes:

Thank you for choosing our baby naming dilemma for your site. We loved hearing your reader’s opinions. When our son was born we did not choose a name until day 3. We even went to your site and read the post, your comments, and your reader’s comments again. My husband finally came around to the name Bennett but after much discussion we agreed to name our son Patrick. Our families love the name and we are enjoying our handsome little guy.